Color blindness

Color blindness
Other names: Colour blindness, color deficiency, impaired color vision[1]
Example of an Ishihara color test plate. With properly configured computer displays, people with normal vision should see the number "74". Many people who are color blind see it as "21", and those with total color blindness may not see any numbers.
SpecialtyOphthalmology
SymptomsDecreased ability to see colors[2]
DurationLong term[2]
CausesGenetic (inherited usually X-linked)[2]
Diagnostic methodIshihara color test[2]
TreatmentAdjustments to teaching methods, mobile apps[1][2]
FrequencyRed–green: 8% males, 0.5% females (Northern European descent)[2]

Color blindness, also known as color vision deficiency, is the decreased ability to see color or differences in color.[2] Simple tasks such as selecting ripe fruit, choosing clothing, and reading traffic lights can be more challenging.[2] Color blindness may also make some educational activities more difficult.[2] However, problems are generally minor, and most people find that they can adapt.[2] People with total color blindness (achromatopsia) may also have decreased visual acuity and be uncomfortable in bright environments.[2]

The most common cause of color blindness is an inherited problem in the development of one or more of the three sets of color-sensing cones in the eye.[2] Males are more likely to be color blind than females, as the genes responsible for the most common forms of color blindness are on the X chromosome.[2] As females have two X chromosomes, a defect in one is typically compensated for by the other, and she is a carrier carriers.[2] Males only have one X chromosome and therefore express the genetic disorder when possessing the gene.[2] Color blindness can also result from physical or chemical damage to the eye, optic nerve or parts of the brain.[2] Diagnosis is typically with the Ishihara color test; however, a number of other testing methods, including genetic testing, also exist.[2][3]

There is no cure for color blindness.[2] Diagnosis may allow a person's teacher to change their method of teaching to accommodate the decreased ability to recognize colors.[1] Special lenses may help people with red–green color blindness when under bright conditions.[2] There are also mobile apps that can help people identify colors.[2]

Red–green color blindness is the most common form, followed by blue–yellow color blindness and total color blindness.[2] Red–green color blindness affects up to 8% of males and 0.5% of females of Northern European descent.[2][4] The ability to see color also decreases in old age.[2] Being color blind may make people ineligible for certain jobs in certain countries.[1] This may include being a pilot, train driver, crane operator, and working in the armed forces.[1][5] The effect of color blindness on artistic ability, however, is controversial.[1][6] The ability to draw appears to be unchanged, and a number of famous artists are believed to have been color blind.[1][7]

Signs and symptoms

Simulation of the normal (above) and dichromatic (below) perception of red and green apples
Horizontal traffic light in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

In almost all cases, color blind people retain blue–yellow discrimination, and most color blind individuals are anomalous trichromats rather than complete dichromats. In practice, this means that they often retain a limited discrimination along the red–green axis of color space, although their ability to separate colors in this dimension is reduced. Color blindness very rarely refers to complete monochromatism.[8]

Dichromats often confuse red and green items. For example, they may find it difficult to distinguish a Braeburn apple from a Granny Smith or red from green of traffic lights without other clues—for example, shape or position. Dichromats tend to learn to use texture and shape clues and so may be able to penetrate camouflage that has been designed to deceive individuals with normal color vision.[9]

Colors of traffic lights are confusing to some dichromats as there is insufficient apparent difference between the red/amber traffic lights and sodium street lamps; also, the green can be confused with a grubby white lamp. This is a risk on high-speed undulating roads where angular cues cannot be used. British Rail color lamp signals use more easily identifiable colors: The red is blood red, the amber is yellow and the green is a bluish color. Most British road traffic lights are mounted vertically on a black rectangle with a white border (forming a "sighting board") and so dichromats can more easily look for the position of the light within the rectangle—top, middle or bottom. In the eastern provinces of Canada horizontally mounted traffic lights are generally differentiated by shape to facilitate identification for those with color blindness. In the United States, this is not done by shape but by position, as the red light is always on the left if the light is horizontal, or on top if the light is vertical. However, a lone flashing light (e.g. red for stop, yellow for caution) is still problematic.

Causes

Color vision deficiencies can be classified as acquired or inherited.

  • Acquired: Diseases, drugs (e.g., hydroxychloroquine[10]), and chemicals such as styrene[11] or organic solvents[12] may cause color blindness.[13][14]
  • Inherited: There are three types of inherited or congenital color vision deficiencies: monochromacy, dichromacy, and anomalous trichromacy.
    • Monochromacy, also known as "total color blindness", is the lack of ability to distinguish colors (and thus the person views everything as if it were on a black and white television); caused by cone defect or absence. Monochromacy occurs when two or all three of the cone pigments are missing and color and lightness vision is reduced to one dimension.
      • Rod monochromacy (achromatopsia) is an exceedingly rare, nonprogressive inability to distinguish any colors as a result of absent or nonfunctioning retinal cones. It is associated with light sensitivity (photophobia), involuntary eye oscillations (nystagmus), and poor vision.
      • Cone monochromacy is a rare total color blindness that is accompanied by relatively normal vision, electroretinogram, and electrooculogram. Cone monochromacy can also be a result of having more than one type of dichromatic color blindness. People who have, for instance, both protanopia and tritanopia are considered to have cone monochromacy. Since cone monochromacy is the lack of/damage of more than one cone in retinal environment, having two types of dichromacy would be an equivalent.
    • Dichromacy is hereditary. Protanopia and deuteranopia are hereditary and sex-linked, affecting predominantly males.
      • Protanopia is caused by the complete absence of red retinal photoreceptors. Protans have difficulties distinguishing between blue and green colors and also between red and green colors. It is a form of dichromatism in which the subject can only perceive light wavelengths from 400 nm to 650 nm, instead of the usual 700 nm. Pure reds cannot be seen, instead appearing black; purple colors cannot be distinguished from blues; more orange-tinted reds may appear as dim yellows, and all orange–yellow–green shades of too long a wavelength to stimulate the blue receptors appear as a similar yellow hue. It is present in 1% of males.
      • Deuteranopia affects hue discrimination in a similar way to protanopia, but without the dimming effect. Again, it is found in about 1% of the male population.[15]
      • Tritanopia is a very rare color vision disturbance in which only the red and the green cone pigments are present, with a total absence of blue retinal receptors. Blues appear greenish, yellows and oranges appear pinkish, and purple colors appear deep red. It is related to chromosome 7; thus unlike protanopia and deuteranopia, tritanopia and tritanomaly are not sex-linked traits and can be acquired rather than inherited and can be reversed in some cases.
    • Anomalous trichromacy is a common type of inherited color vision deficiency, occurring when one of the three cone pigments is altered in its spectral sensitivity.
      • Protanomaly is a mild color vision defect in which an altered spectral sensitivity of red retinal receptors (closer to green receptor response) results in poor red–green hue discrimination. It is hereditary, sex-linked, and present in 1% of males. In contrast to other defects, in this case the L-cone is present but malfunctioning, whereas in protanopia the L-cone is completely missing.[16]
      • Deuteranomaly, caused by a similar shift in the green retinal receptors, is by far the most common type of color vision deficiency, mildly affecting red–green hue discrimination in 5% of European males. It is hereditary and sex-linked. In contrast to deuteranopia, the green-sensitive cones are not missing but malfunctioning.[17]
      • Tritanomaly is a rare, hereditary color vision deficiency affecting blue–green and yellow–red/pink hue discrimination. It is related to chromosome 7.[18] In contrast to tritanopia, the S-cone is malfunctioning but not missing.[19]

Genetics

Color blindness is typically an inherited genetic disorder. It is most commonly inherited from mutations on the X chromosome, but the mapping of the human genome has shown there are many causative mutations—mutations capable of causing color blindness originate from at least 19 different chromosomes and 56 different genes (as shown online at the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)).

Two of the most common inherited forms of color blindness are protanomaly (and, more rarely, protanopia—the two together often known as "protans") and deuteranomaly (or, more rarely, deuteranopia—the two together often referred to as "deutans").[20] Both "protans" and "deutans" (of which the deutans are by far the most common) are known as "red–green color-blind". They comprise about 8% of human males and 0.6% of females of Northern European ancestry.[21]

Some of the inherited diseases known to cause color blindness are:

Inherited color blindness can be congenital (from birth), or it can commence in childhood or adulthood. Depending on the mutation, it can be stationary, that is, remain the same throughout a person's lifetime, or progressive. As progressive phenotypes involve deterioration of the retina and other parts of the eye, certain forms of color blindness can progress to legal blindness, i.e. an acuity of 6/60 (20/200) or worse, and often leave a person with complete blindness.

Color blindness always pertains to the cone photoreceptors in retinas, as it is the cones that detect the color frequencies of light.

About 8% of males, and 0.4% of females, are red–green color blind in some way or another, whether it is one color, a color combination, or another mutation.[22] Males are at a greater risk of inheriting an X-linked mutation because males only have one X chromosome (XY, with the Y chromosome carrying altogether different genes from the X chromosome), and females have two (XX); if a woman inherits a normal X chromosome in addition to the one that carries the mutation, she will not display the mutation. Men do not have a second X chromosome to override the chromosome that carries the mutation. If 8% of variants of a given gene are defective, the probability of a single copy being defective is 8%, but the probability that two copies are both defective is 0.082, i.e. 0.64%.

  • Y: male chromosome, neutral for green-red color blindness.
  • X: normal X chromosome.
  • Xd: X chromosome with a deficiency.
  • XdG: X chromosome with a deficiency of green.
  • XdR: X chromosome with a deficiency of red.
Genotype Result
X Y Unaffected man
Xd Y Affected man
X X Unaffected woman
Xd X Carrier woman
XdG XdR Carrier woman with 2 defective X
XdG XdG or XdR XdR Affected woman
Mother Father Daughter 1 Daughter 2 Son 1 Son 2
Affected Affected
same color deficiency of mother
Affected
Affected
Affected
different color deficiency of mother
Carrier
with 2 defective X
Unaffected
Carrier
Carrier
with 2 defective X
Affected AffectedCarrier
with 2 defective X
Unaffected
Carrier
Carrier Affected
same color deficiency of mother
AffectedCarrier AffectedUnaffected
Affected
different color deficiency of mother
Carrier
with 2 defective X
UnaffectedCarrierUnaffected
Unaffected Affected
Carrier
Unaffected
Unaffected
Unaffected

Other causes

Other causes of color blindness include brain or retinal damage caused by accidents and other traumas which produce swelling of the brain in the occipital lobe, and damage to the retina caused by exposure to ultraviolet light (wavelengths 10 to 300 nm). Damage often presents itself later in life.

Color blindness may also present itself in the range of degenerative diseases of the eye, such as age-related macular degeneration, and as part of the retinal damage caused by diabetes. Vitamin A deficiency may also cause color blindness.[23]

Some subtle forms of color blindness may be associated with chronic solvent-induced encephalopathy (CSE), caused by long-time exposure to solvent vapors.[24]

Red–green color blindness can be caused by ethambutol,[25] a drug used in the treatment of tuberculosis.

Mechanism

The typical human retina contains two kinds of light cells: the rod cells (active in low light) and the cone cells (active in normal daylight). Normally, there are three kinds of cone cells, each containing a different pigment, which are activated when the pigments absorb light. The spectral sensitivities of the cones differ; one is most sensitive to short wavelengths, one to medium wavelengths, and the third to medium-to-long wavelengths within the visible spectrum, with their peak sensitivities in the blue, green, and yellow–green regions of the spectrum, respectively. The absorption spectra of the three systems overlap, and combine to cover the visible spectrum. These receptors are known as short (S), medium (M), and long (L) wavelength cones, but are also often referred to as blue, green, and red cones, although this terminology is inaccurate.[26]

The receptors are each responsive to a wide range of wavelengths. For example, the long wavelength "red" receptor has its peak sensitivity in the yellow–green, some way from the red end (longest wavelength) of the visible spectrum. The sensitivity of normal color vision actually depends on the overlap between the absorption ranges of the three systems: different colors are recognized when the different types of cone are stimulated to different degrees. Red light, for example, stimulates the long wavelength cones much more than either of the others, and reducing the wavelength causes the other two cone systems to be increasingly stimulated, causing a gradual change in hue.

Many of the genes involved in color vision are on the X chromosome, making color blindness much more common in males than in females because males only have one X chromosome, while females have two. An estimated 2–3% of women have two slightly different red colour cones[27] and can be considered tetrachromats. One such woman has been reported to be a true or functional tetrachromat, as she can discriminate colors most other people can't.[28][29]

Diagnosis

An Ishihara test image as seen by subjects with normal color vision and by those with a variety of color deficiencies

The Ishihara color test, which consists of a series of pictures of colored spots, is the test most often used to diagnose red–green color deficiencies.[30] A figure (usually one or more Arabic digits) is embedded in the picture as a number of spots in a slightly different color, and can be seen with normal color vision, but not with a particular color defect. The full set of tests has a variety of figure/background color combinations, and enable diagnosis of which particular visual defect is present. The anomaloscope, described above, is also used in diagnosing anomalous trichromacy.

Position yourself about 75cm from your monitor so that the colour test image you are looking at is at eye level, read the description of the image and see what you can see!! It is not necessary in all cases to use the entire set of images. In a large scale examination the test can be simplified to six tests; test, one of tests 2 or 3, one of tests 4, 5, 6, or 7, one of tests 8 or 9, one of tests 10, 11, 12, or 13 and one of tests 14 or 15.

Because the Ishihara color test contains only numerals, it may not be useful in diagnosing young children, who have not yet learned to use numbers. In the interest of identifying these problems early on in life, alternative color vision tests were developed using only symbols (square, circle, car).

Besides the Ishihara color test, the US Navy and US Army also allow testing with the Farnsworth Lantern Test. This test allows 30% of color deficient individuals, whose deficiency is not too severe, to pass.

Another test used by clinicians to measure chromatic discrimination is the Farnsworth–Munsell 100 hue test. The patient is asked to arrange a set of colored caps or chips to form a gradual transition of color between two anchor caps.[31]

The HRR color test (developed by Hardy, Rand, and Rittler) is a red–green color test that, unlike the Ishihara, also has plates for the detection of the tritan defects.[32]

Most clinical tests are designed to be fast, simple, and effective at identifying broad categories of color blindness. In academic studies of color blindness, on the other hand, there is more interest in developing flexible tests to collect thorough datasets, identify copunctal points, and measure just noticeable differences.[33]

Classification

These color charts show how different colorblind people see compared to a person with normal color vision.

Types of color blindness and the terms used

Cone
system
RedGreenBlue
N=normal
A=anomalous
NANANA
1Normal visionTrichromatNormal
2ProtanomalyAnomalous TrichromatPartially color blindRed–green
3ProtanopiaDichromatPartially color blindRed–green
4DeuteranomalyAnomalous TrichromatPartially color blindRed–green
5DeuteranopiaDichromatPartially color blindRed–green
6TritanomalyAnomalous TrichromatPartially color blindBlue–yellow
7TritanopiaDichromatPartially color blindBlue–yellow
8AchromatopsiaMonochromatTotally color blind
9Tetrachromat
10

Based on clinical appearance, color blindness may be described as total or partial. Total color blindness is much less common than partial color blindness.[34] There are two major types of color blindness: difficulty distinguishing between red and green, and difficulty distinguishing between blue and yellow.[35][36]

Immunofluorescent imaging is a way to determine red–green color coding. Conventional color coding is difficult for individuals with red–green color blindness (protanopia or deuteranopia) to discriminate. Replacing red with magenta or green with turquoise improves visibility for such individuals.[37]

The different kinds of inherited color blindness result from partial or complete loss of function of one or more of the three different cone systems. When one cone system is compromised, dichromacy results. The most frequent forms of human color blindness result from problems with either the middle (green) or long (red) wavelength sensitive cone systems, and make it hard to discriminate reds, yellows, and greens from one another. They are collectively referred to as "red–green color blindness", though the term is an over-simplification and is somewhat misleading. Other forms of color blindness are much more rare. They include problems in discriminating blues from greens and yellows from reds/pinks, and the rarest form of all, complete color blindness or monochromacy, where one cannot distinguish any color from grey, as in a black-and-white movie or photograph.

Protanopes, deuteranopes, and tritanopes are dichromats; that is, they can match any color they see with some mixture of just two primary colors (in contrast to those with normal sight (trichromats) who can distinguish three primary colors). Dichromats usually know they have a color vision problem, and it can affect their daily lives. Out of the male population, 2% have severe difficulties distinguishing between red, orange, yellow, and green. (Orange and yellow are different combinations of red and green light.) Colors in this range, which appear very different to a normal viewer, appear to a dichromat to be the same or a similar color. The terms protanopia, deuteranopia, and tritanopia come from Greek, and respectively mean "inability to see (anopia) with the first (prot-), second (deuter-), or third (trit-) [cone]".

Anomalous trichromacy is the least serious type of color deficiency.[38] People with protanomaly, deuteranomaly, or tritanomaly are trichromats, but the color matches they make differ from the normal. They are called anomalous trichromats. In order to match a given spectral yellow light, protanomalous observers need more red light in a red/green mixture than a normal observer, and deuteranomalous observers need more green. From a practical standpoint though, many protanomalous and deuteranomalous people have very little difficulty carrying out tasks that require normal color vision. Some may not even be aware that their color perception is in any way different from normal.

Protanomaly and deuteranomaly can be diagnosed using an instrument called an anomaloscope, which mixes spectral red and green lights in variable proportions, for comparison with a fixed spectral yellow. If this is done in front of a large audience of males, as the proportion of red is increased from a low value, first a small proportion of the audience will declare a match, while most will see the mixed light as greenish; these are the deuteranomalous observers. Next, as more red is added the majority will say that a match has been achieved. Finally, as yet more red is added, the remaining, protanomalous, observers will declare a match at a point where normal observers will see the mixed light as definitely reddish.

Red–green color blindness

Protanopia, deuteranopia, protanomaly, and deuteranomaly are commonly inherited forms of red–green color blindness which affect a substantial portion of the human population. Those affected have difficulty with discriminating red and green hues due to the absence or mutation of the red or green retinal photoreceptors.[20][39] It is sex-linked: genetic red–green color blindness affects males much more often than females, because the genes for the red and green color receptors are located on the X chromosome, of which males have only one and females have two. Females (XX) are red–green color blind only if both their X chromosomes are defective with a similar deficiency, whereas males (XY) are color blind if their single X chromosome is defective.[40]

The gene for red–green color blindness is transmitted from a color blind male to all his daughters, who are usually heterozygote carriers and are thus unaffected. In turn, a carrier woman has a 50% chance of passing on a mutated X chromosome region to each of her male offspring. The sons of an affected male will not inherit the trait from him, since they receive his Y chromosome and not his (defective) X chromosome. Should an affected male have children with a carrier or colorblind woman, their daughters may be colorblind by inheriting an affected X chromosome from each parent.[40]

Because one X chromosome is inactivated at random in each cell during a woman's development, deuteranomalous heterozygotes (i.e. female carriers of deuteranomaly) may be tetrachromats, because they will have the normal long wave (red) receptors, the normal medium wave (green) receptors, the abnormal medium wave (deuteranomalous) receptors and the normal autosomal short wave (blue) receptors in their retinas.[27][28][29] The same applies to the carriers of protanomaly (who have two types of long wave receptors, normal medium wave receptors, and normal autosomal short wave receptors in their retinas). If, by rare chance, a woman is heterozygous for both protanomaly and deuteranomaly, she could be pentachromatic. This situation could arise if, for instance, she inherited the X chromosome with the abnormal long wave gene (but normal medium wave gene) from her mother who is a carrier of protanomaly, and her other X chromosome from a deuteranomalous father. Such a woman would have a normal and an abnormal long wave receptor, a normal and abnormal medium wave receptor, and a normal autosomal short wave receptor—5 different types of color receptors in all. The degree to which women who are carriers of either protanomaly or deuteranomaly are demonstrably tetrachromatic and require a mixture of four spectral lights to match an arbitrary light is very variable. In many cases it is almost unnoticeable, but in a minority the tetrachromacy is very pronounced.[27][28][29] However, Jameson et al.[41] have shown that with appropriate and sufficiently sensitive equipment it can be demonstrated that any female carrier of red–green color blindness (i.e. heterozygous protanomaly, or heterozygous deuteranomaly) is a tetrachromat to a greater or lesser extent. People in whom deuteranopia or deuteranomaly manifest are sometimes referred to as deutans, those with protanopia or protanomaly as protans.[42]

Since deuteranomaly is by far the most common form of red–green blindness among men of northwestern European descent (with an incidence of 8%) it follows that the proportion of carriers (and of potential deuteranomalous tetrachromats) among the females of that genetic stock is 14.7% (i.e. 92% × 8% × 2), based on the Hardy–Weinberg principle.[40]

Illustration of the distribution of cone cells in the fovea of an individual with normal color vision (left), and a color blind (protanopic) retina. The center of the fovea holds very few blue-sensitive cones.

  • Protanopia (1% of males): Lacking the red cones for long-wavelength sensitive retinal cones, those with this condition are unable to distinguish between colors in the green–yellow–red section of the spectrum. They have a neutral point at a cyan-like wavelength around 492 nm (see spectral color for comparison)—that is, they cannot discriminate light of this wavelength from white. For a protanope, the brightness of red, orange, and yellow are much reduced compared to normal. This dimming can be so pronounced that reds may be confused with black or dark gray, and red traffic lights may appear to be extinguished. They may learn to distinguish reds from yellows primarily on the basis of their apparent brightness or lightness, not on any perceptible hue difference. Violet, lavender, and purple are indistinguishable from various shades of blue because their reddish components are so dimmed as to be invisible. For example, pink flowers, reflecting both red light and blue light, may appear just blue to the protanope. A very few people have been found who have one normal eye and one protanopic eye. These unilateral dichromats report that with only their protanopic eye open, they see wavelengths shorter than neutral point as blue and those longer than it as yellow. This is a rare form of color blindness.

  • Deuteranopia (1% of males): Lacking the green cones for medium-wavelength cones, those affected are again unable to distinguish between colors in the green–yellow–red section of the spectrum. Their neutral point is at a slightly longer wavelength, 498 nm, a more greenish hue of cyan. A deuteranope suffers the same hue discrimination problems as protanopes, but without the abnormal dimming. Purple colors are not perceived as something opposite to spectral colors; all these appear similarly. This form of colorblindness is also known as Daltonism after John Dalton (his diagnosis was confirmed as deuteranopia in 1995, some 150 years after his death, by DNA analysis of his preserved eyeball). Equivalent terms for Daltonism in Romance languages such as daltonismo (Spanish, Portuguese and Italian), daltonisme (French), daltonism (Romanian) and in Slavic languages such as daltonizam (Croatian), daltonizam/далтонизам (Serbian), далтонизам (Macedonian), дальтонизм (Russian), дальтонізм (Ukrainian) and дальтанізм (Belarusian) are still used to describe color blindess in a broad sense or deuteranopia in a more restricted sense. Deuteranopic unilateral dichromats report that with only their deuteranopic eye open, they see wavelengths shorter than neutral point as blue and longer than it as yellow.[43]

  • Protanomaly (1% of males, 0.01% of females):[44] Having a mutated form of the long-wavelength (red) pigment, whose peak sensitivity is at a shorter wavelength than in the normal retina, protanomalous individuals are less sensitive to red light than normal. This means that they are less able to discriminate colors, and they do not see mixed lights as having the same colors as normal observers. They also suffer from a darkening of the red end of the spectrum. This causes reds to reduce in intensity to the point where they can be mistaken for black. Protanomaly is a fairly rare form of color blindness, making up about 1% of the male population. Both protanomaly and deuteranomaly are carried on the X chromosome.

  • Deuteranomaly (most common—6% of males, 0.4% of females):[44] These individuals have a mutated form of the medium-wavelength (green) pigment. The medium-wavelength pigment is shifted towards the red end of the spectrum resulting in a reduction in sensitivity to the green area of the spectrum. Unlike in protanomaly, the intensity of colors is unchanged. The deuteranomalous person is considered "green weak". For example, in the evening, dark green cars appear to be black to deuteranomalous people. As with protanomates, deuteranomates are poor at discriminating small differences in hues in the red, orange, yellow, green region of the spectrum. They make errors in the naming of hues in this region because the hues appear somewhat shifted towards green. However, unlike protanomates, deuteranomalous people do not have the loss of "brightness" problem.
People with deuteranomaly may be better at distinguishing shades of khaki than people with normal vision and may be at an advantage when looking for, say, predators, food, or camouflaged objects hidden among foliage.[45][46]

Blue–yellow color blindness

Those with tritanopia and tritanomaly have difficulty discerning between bluish and greenish hues, as well as yellowish and reddish hues.

Color blindness involving the inactivation of the short-wavelength sensitive cone system (whose absorption spectrum peaks in the bluish-violet) is called tritanopia or, loosely, blue–yellow color blindness. The tritanope's neutral point occurs near a yellowish 570 nm; green is perceived at shorter wavelengths and red at longer wavelengths.[47] Mutation of the short-wavelength sensitive cones is called tritanomaly. Tritanopia is equally distributed among males and females. Jeremy H. Nathans (with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute) demonstrated that the gene coding for the blue receptor lies on chromosome 7, which is shared equally by males and females. Therefore, it is not sex-linked. This gene does not have any neighbor whose DNA sequence is similar. Blue color blindness is caused by a simple mutation in this gene.

  • Tritanopia (less than 1% of males and females): Lacking the short-wavelength cones, those affected see short-wavelength colors (blue, indigo and a spectral violet) greenish and drastically dimmed, some of these colors even as black. Yellow is indistinguishable from pink, and purple colors are perceived as various shades of red. This form of color blindness is not sex-linked.

  • Tritanomaly (equally rare for males and females [0.01% for both]):[44] Having a mutated form of the short-wavelength (blue) pigment. The short-wavelength pigment is shifted towards the green area of the spectrum. This is the rarest form of anomalous trichromacy color blindness. Unlike the other anomalous trichromacy color deficiencies, the mutation for this color blindness is carried on chromosome 7. Therefore, it is equally prevalent in both male and female populations. The OMIM gene code for this mutation is 304000 "Colorblindness, Partial Tritanomaly".[48]

Total color blindness

Total color blindness is defined as the inability to see color. Although the term may refer to acquired disorders such as cerebral achromatopsia also known as color agnosia, it typically refers to congenital color vision disorders (i.e. more frequently rod monochromacy and less frequently cone monochromacy).[49][50]

In cerebral achromatopsia, a person cannot perceive colors even though the eyes are capable of distinguishing them. Some sources do not consider these to be true color blindness, because the failure is of perception, not of vision. They are forms of visual agnosia.[50]

Monochromacy is the condition of possessing only a single channel for conveying information about color. Monochromats possess a complete inability to distinguish any colors and perceive only variations in brightness. It occurs in two primary forms:

  1. Rod monochromacy, frequently called achromatopsia, where the retina contains no cone cells, so that in addition to the absence of color discrimination, vision in lights of normal intensity is difficult. While normally rare, achromatopsia is very common on the island of Pingelap, a part of the Pohnpei state, Federated States of Micronesia, where it is called maskun: about 10% of the population there has it, and 30% are unaffected carriers. The island was devastated by a storm in the 18th century (an example of a genetic bottleneck) and one of the few male survivors carried a gene for achromatopsia. The population grew to several thousand before the 1940s.
  2. Cone monochromacy is the condition of having both rods and cones, but only a single kind of cone. A cone monochromat can have good pattern vision at normal daylight levels, but will not be able to distinguish hues. Blue cone monochromacy (X chromosome) is caused by lack of functionality of L and M cones (red and green). It is encoded at the same place as red–green color blindness on the X chromosome. Peak spectral sensitivities are in the blue region of the visible spectrum (near 440 nm). People with this condition generally show nystagmus ("jiggling eyes"), photophobia (light sensitivity), reduced visual acuity, and myopia (nearsightedness).[51] Visual acuity usually falls to the 20/50 to 20/400 range.

Management

There is no cure for color deficiencies. ″The American Optometric Association reports a contact lens on one eye can increase the ability to differentiate between colors, though nothing can make you truly see the deficient color.″[52]

Lenses

Optometrists can supply colored spectacle lenses or a single red-tint contact lens to wear on the non-dominant eye, but although this may improve discrimination of some colors, it can make other colors more difficult to distinguish. A 1981 review of various studies to evaluate the effect of the X-chrom contact lens concluded that, while the lens may allow the wearer to achieve a better score on certain color vision tests, it did not correct color vision in the natural environment.[53] A case history using the X-Chrom lens for a rod monochromat is reported[54] and an X-Chrom manual is online.[55]

Lenses that filter certain wavelengths of light can allow people with a cone anomaly, but not dichromacy, to see better separation of colors, especially those with classic "red/green" color blindness. They work by notching out wavelengths that strongly stimulate both red and green cones in a deuter- or protanomalous person, improving the distinction between the two cones' signals. As of 2012, sunglasses that notch out color wavelengths are available commercially.[56]

Apps

Many mobile and computer applications have been developed to help color blind individual to view better differentiate between colors. Some applications launch a simulation of colorblindness to allow people with typical vision to understand how people with color blindness see the world, which can improve inclusive design for both groups.[57]

Epidemiology

Rates of color blindness
MalesFemales
Dichromacy2.4%0.03%
Protanopia (red deficient: L cone absent)1.3%0.02%
Deuteranopia (green deficient: M cone absent)1.2%0.01%
Tritanopia (blue deficient: S cone absent)0.001%0.03%
Anomalous trichromacy6.3%0.37%
Protanomaly (red deficient: L cone defect)1.3%0.02%
Deuteranomaly (green deficient: M cone defect)5.0%0.35%
Tritanomaly (blue deficient: S cone defect)0.0001%0.0001%

Color blindness affects a large number of individuals, with protans and deutans being the most common types.[20] In individuals with Northern European ancestry, as many as 8 percent of men and 0.4 percent of women experience congenital color deficiency.[58]

The number affected varies among groups. Isolated communities with a restricted gene pool sometimes produce high proportions of color blindness, including the less usual types. Examples include rural Finland, Hungary, and some of the Scottish islands. In the United States, about 7 percent of the male population—or about 10.5 million men—and 0.4 percent of the female population either cannot distinguish red from green, or see red and green differently from how others do (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 2006). More than 95 percent of all variations in human color vision involve the red and green receptors in male eyes. It is very rare for males or females to be "blind" to the blue end of the spectrum.[59]

Prevalence of red–green color blindness among males[60]
Population Number
studied
 %
Arabs (Druzes) 337 10.0
Aboriginal Australians 4,455 1.9
Belgians 9,540 7.4
Bosnians 4,836 6.2
Britons 16,180 6.6
Chinese 1,164 6.9
DR Congolese 929 1.7
Dutch 3,168 8.0
Eskimo 297 2.5
Fijians 608 0.8
French 1,243 8.6
Germans 7,861 7.7
Hutu 1,000 2.9
Indians (Andhra Pradesh) 292 7.5
Iranians 16,180 6.6
Japanese 259,000 4.0
Mexicans 571 2.3
Navajo 571 2.3
Norwegians 9,047 9.0
Russians 1,343 9.2
Scots 463 7.8
Swiss 2,000 8.0
Tibetans 241 5.0
Tswana 407 2.0
Tutsi 1,000 2.5
Serbs 4,750 7.4

History

An 1895 illustration of normal vision and various kinds of color blindness. It is not accurate, but shows the views on this subject at the time.

The first scientific paper on the subject of color blindness, Extraordinary facts relating to the vision of colours, was published by the English chemist John Dalton in 1798[61] after the realization of his own color blindness. Because of Dalton's work, the general condition has been called daltonism, although in English this term is now used only for deuteranopia.

Society and culture

Design implications

snippet of colored cells in a table (foreground), surrounded in background showing how the image appears in color-blindness simulations.
Testing the colors of a web chart, (center), to ensure that no information is lost to the various forms of color blindness.

Color codes present particular problems for those with color deficiencies as they are often difficult or impossible for them to perceive.

Good graphic design avoids using color coding or using color contrasts alone to express information;[62] this not only helps color blind people, but also aids understanding by normally sighted people by providing them with multiple reinforcing cues.

Designers need to take into account that color-blindness is highly sensitive to differences in material. For example, a red–green colorblind person who is incapable of distinguishing colors on a map printed on paper may have no such difficulty when viewing the map on a computer screen or television. In addition, some color blind people find it easier to distinguish problem colors on artificial materials, such as plastic or in acrylic paints, than on natural materials, such as paper or wood. Third, for some color blind people, color can only be distinguished if there is a sufficient "mass" of color: thin lines might appear black, while a thicker line of the same color can be perceived as having color.

Designers should also note that red–blue and yellow–blue color combinations are generally safe. So instead of the ever-popular "red means bad and green means good" system, using these combinations can lead to a much higher ability to use color coding effectively. This will still cause problems for those with monochromatic color blindness, but it is still something worth considering.[63]

When the need to process visual information as rapidly as possible arises, for example in an emergency situation, the visual system may operate only in shades of gray, with the extra information load in adding color being dropped. This is an important possibility to consider when designing, for example, emergency brake handles or emergency phones.

Occupations

Color blindness may make it difficult or impossible for a person to engage in certain occupations. Persons with color blindness may be legally or practically barred from occupations in which color perception is an essential part of the job (e.g., mixing paint colors), or in which color perception is important for safety (e.g., operating vehicles in response to color-coded signals). This occupational safety principle originates from the Lagerlunda train crash of 1875 in Sweden. Following the crash, Professor Alarik Frithiof Holmgren, a physiologist, investigated and concluded that the color blindness of the engineer (who had died) had caused the crash. Professor Holmgren then created the first test using different-colored skeins to exclude people from jobs in the transportation industry on the basis of color blindness.[64] However, there is a claim that there is no firm evidence that color deficiency did cause the collision, or that it might have not been the sole cause.[65]

Color vision is important for occupations using telephone or computer networking cabling, as the individual wires inside the cables are color-coded using green, orange, brown, blue and white colors.[66] Electronic wiring, transformers, resistors, and capacitors are color-coded as well, using black, brown, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, violet, gray, white, silver, gold.[67]

Driving

Some countries have refused to grant driving licenses to individuals with color blindness. In Romania, there is an ongoing campaign to remove the legal restrictions that prohibit colorblind citizens from getting drivers' licenses.

The usual justification for such restrictions is that drivers of motor vehicles must be able to recognize color-coded signals, such as traffic lights or warning lights.[63]

Piloting aircraft

While many aspects of aviation depend on color coding, only a few of them are critical enough to be interfered with by some milder types of color blindness. Some examples include color-gun signaling of aircraft that have lost radio communication, color-coded glide-path indications on runways, and the like. Some jurisdictions restrict the issuance of pilot credentials to persons who suffer from color blindness for this reason. Restrictions may be partial, allowing color-blind persons to obtain certification but with restrictions, or total, in which case color-blind persons are not permitted to obtain piloting credentials at all.[68]

In the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration requires that pilots be tested for normal color vision as part of their medical clearance in order to obtain the required medical certificate, a prerequisite to obtaining a pilot's certification. If testing reveals color blindness, the applicant may be issued a license with restrictions, such as no night flying and no flying by color signals—such a restriction effectively prevents a pilot from holding certain flying occupations, such as that of an airline pilot, although commercial pilot certification is still possible, and there are a few flying occupations that do not require night flight and thus are still available to those with restrictions due to color blindness (e.g., agricultural aviation). The government allows several types of tests, including medical standard tests (e.g., the Ishihara, Dvorine, and others) and specialized tests oriented specifically to the needs of aviation. If an applicant fails the standard tests, they will receive a restriction on their medical certificate that states: "Not valid for night flying or by color signal control". They may apply to the FAA to take a specialized test, administered by the FAA. Typically, this test is the "color vision light gun test". For this test an FAA inspector will meet the pilot at an airport with an operating control tower. The color signal light gun will be shone at the pilot from the tower, and they must identify the color. If they pass they may be issued a waiver, which states that the color vision test is no longer required during medical examinations. They will then receive a new medical certificate with the restriction removed. This was once a Statement of Demonstrated Ability (SODA), but the SODA was dropped, and converted to a simple waiver (letter) early in the 2000s.[69]

Research published in 2009 carried out by the City University of London's Applied Vision Research Centre, sponsored by the UK's Civil Aviation Authority and the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, has established a more accurate assessment of color deficiencies in pilot applicants' red/green and yellow–blue color range which could lead to a 35% reduction in the number of prospective pilots who fail to meet the minimum medical threshold.[70]

Art

Inability to distinguish color does not necessarily preclude the ability to become a celebrated artist. The 20th century expressionist painter Clifton Pugh, three-time winner of Australia's Archibald Prize, on biographical, gene inheritance and other grounds has been identified as a protanope.[71] 19th century French artist Charles Méryon became successful by concentrating on etching rather than painting after he was diagnosed as having a red–green deficiency.[72] Jin Kim's red–green color blindness did not stop him from becoming first an animator and later a character designer with Walt Disney Animation Studios.[73]

Rights of the color blind

Brazil

A Brazilian court ruled that people with color blindness are protected by the Inter-American Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Person with Disabilities.[74][75][76]

At trial, it was decided that the carriers of color blindness have a right of access to wider knowledge, or the full enjoyment of their human condition.

United States

In the United States, under federal anti-discrimination laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, color vision deficiencies have not been found to constitute a disability that triggers protection from workplace discrimination.[77]

A famous traffic light on Tipperary Hill in Syracuse, New York, is upside-down due to the sentiments of its Irish American community,[78] but has been criticized due to the potential hazard it poses for color-blind persons.[79]

Research

Some tentative evidence finds that color blind people are better at penetrating certain color camouflages. Such findings may give an evolutionary reason for the high rate of red–green color blindness.[9] There is also a study suggesting that people with some types of color blindness can distinguish colors that people with normal color vision are not able to distinguish.[80] In World War II, color blind observers were used to penetrate camouflage.[81]

In September 2009, the journal Nature reported that researchers at the University of Washington and University of Florida were able to give trichromatic vision to squirrel monkeys, which normally have only dichromatic vision, using gene therapy.[82]

In 2003, a cybernetic device called eyeborg was developed to allow the wearer to hear sounds representing different colors.[83] Achromatopsic artist Neil Harbisson was the first to use such a device in early 2004; the eyeborg allowed him to start painting in color by memorizing the sound corresponding to each color. In 2012, at a TED Conference, Harbisson explained how he could now perceive colors outside the ability of human vision.[84]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Gordon N (March 1998). "Colour blindness". Public Health. 112 (2): 81–4. doi:10.1038/sj.ph.1900446. PMID 9581449.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 "Facts About Color Blindness". NEI. February 2015. Archived from the original on 28 July 2016. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  3. Reference, Genetics Home. "Color vision deficiency". Genetics Home Reference. Archived from the original on 2020-01-10. Retrieved 2019-05-06.
  4. Wong, Bang (2011-06-01). "Points of view: Color blindness". Nature Methods. 8 (6): 441. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1618. ISSN 1548-7105. PMID 21774112. Archived from the original on 2020-07-28. Retrieved 2020-08-07.
  5. "OSHA does not have requirements for normal color vision. | Occupational Safety and Health Administration". www.osha.gov. Archived from the original on 2019-05-06. Retrieved 2019-05-06.
  6. Marmor MF, Lanthony P (March 2001). "The dilemma of color deficiency and art". Survey of Ophthalmology. 45 (5): 407–15. doi:10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00192-2. PMID 11274694.
  7. Marmor MF (February 2016). "Vision, eye disease, and art: 2015 Keeler Lecture". Eye. 30 (2): 287–303. doi:10.1038/eye.2015.197. PMC 4763116. PMID 26563659.
  8. Sembulingam, K.; Sembulingam, Prema (2012). Essentials of Medical Physiology. JP Medical Ltd. p. 1002. ISBN 9789350259368. Archived from the original on 2017-09-08.
  9. 1 2 Morgan MJ, Adam A, Mollon JD (June 1992). "Dichromats detect colour-camouflaged objects that are not detected by trichromats". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 248 (1323): 291–5. Bibcode:1992RSPSB.248..291M. doi:10.1098/rspb.1992.0074. PMID 1354367. S2CID 35694740.
  10. Fraunfelder, Frederick T.; Fraunfelder, Frederick W.; Chambers, Wiley A. (2014). Drug-Induced Ocular Side Effects: Clinical Ocular Toxicology E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 79. ISBN 978-0-323-31985-0. Archived from the original on 2021-08-28. Retrieved 2020-08-07.
  11. Choi AR, Braun JM, Papandonatos GD, Greenberg PB (November 2017). "Occupational styrene exposure and acquired dyschromatopsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 60 (11): 930–946. doi:10.1002/ajim.22766. PMC 5652067. PMID 28836685.
  12. Betancur-Sánchez AM, Vásquez-Trespalacios EM, Sardi-Correa C (January 2017). "Impaired colour vision in workers exposed to organic solvents: A systematic review". Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia. 92 (1): 12–18. doi:10.1016/j.oftal.2016.05.008. PMID 27422480.
  13. Acquired Colour Vision Defects Archived 2014-12-16 at the Wayback Machine. colourblindawareness.org
  14. MedlinePlus Encyclopedia: Color blindness
  15. "Types of Color Deficiencies". Konan Medical. Archived from the original on 2015-04-26. Retrieved 2014-04-26.
  16. Protanopia – Red–Green Color Blindness Archived 2015-04-20 at the Wayback Machine. color-blindness.com
  17. Deuteranopia – Red–Green Color Blindness Archived 2015-04-07 at the Wayback Machine. color-blindness.com
  18. Tovee, Martin J. (2008). An Introduction to the Visual System. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-70964-4.
  19. Tritanopia – Blue–Yellow Color Blindness Archived 2015-04-08 at the Wayback Machine. color-blindness.com
  20. 1 2 3 Wong B (June 2011). "Color blindness". Nature Methods. 8 (6): 441. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1618. PMID 21774112. S2CID 36690778.
  21. Albrecht M (October 2010). "Color blindness". Nature Methods. 7 (10): 775, discussion 775. doi:10.1038/nmeth1010-775a. PMID 20885436. S2CID 205417940.
  22. Sharpe, L.T.; Stockman, A.; Jägle, H.; Nathans, J. (1999). "Opsin genes, cone photopigments, color vision and color blindness". In Gegenfurtner, K. R.; Sharpe, L. T. (eds.). Color Vision: From Genes to Perception. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-00439-8. Archived from the original on 2016-12-27.
  23. American Medical Association (2003). Leikin, Jerrold B.; Lipsky, Martin S. (eds.). Complete Medical Encyclopedia (encyclopedia) (First ed.). New York, NY: Random House Reference. p. 388. ISBN 978-0-8129-9100-0.
  24. Dick FD (March 2006). "Solvent neurotoxicity". Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 63 (3): 221–6, 179. doi:10.1136/oem.2005.022400. PMC 2078137. PMID 16497867.
  25. "Myambutol (Ethambutol) Drug Information: Description, User Reviews, Drug Side Effects, Interactions–Prescribing Information at RxList". Rxlist.com. Archived from the original on 2014-07-08. Retrieved 2014-05-24.
  26. "Colour vision deficiency – Causes". NHS Choices. 2012-12-14. Archived from the original on 2014-01-16. Retrieved 2014-05-24.
  27. 1 2 3 Roth, Mark (13 September 2006). "Some women may see 100,000,000 colors, thanks to their genes". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Archived from the original on 8 November 2006.
  28. 1 2 3 Didymus, JohnThomas (Jun 19, 2012), "Scientists find woman who sees 99 million more colors than others", Digital Journal, archived from the original on 2016-02-08
  29. 1 2 3 Jordan G, Deeb SS, Bosten JM, Mollon JD (July 2010). "The dimensionality of color vision in carriers of anomalous trichromacy". Journal of Vision. 10 (8): 12. doi:10.1167/10.8.12. PMID 20884587.
  30. Gordon N (March 1998). "Colour blindness". Public Health. 112 (2): 81–4. doi:10.1038/sj.ph.1900446. PMID 9581449.
  31. Kinnear PR, Sahraie A (December 2002). "New Farnsworth–Munsell 100 hue test norms of normal observers for each year of age 5-22 and for age decades 30-70". The British Journal of Ophthalmology. 86 (12): 1408–11. doi:10.1136/bjo.86.12.1408. PMC 1771429. PMID 12446376.
  32. Cole BL, Lian KY, Lakkis C (March 2006). "The new Richmond HRR pseudoisochromatic test for colour vision is better than the Ishihara test". Clinical & Experimental Optometry. 89 (2): 73–80. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00015.x. PMID 16494609.
  33. Toufeeq A (October 2004). "Specifying colours for colour vision testing using computer graphics". Eye. 18 (10): 1001–5. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701378. PMID 15192692.
  34. Spring, Kenneth R.; Parry-Hill, Matthew J.; Fellers, Thomas J.; Davidson, Michael W. "Human Vision and Color Perception". Florida State University. Archived from the original on 2007-08-27. Retrieved 2007-04-05.
  35. Hoffman, Paul S. "Accommodating Color Blindness" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 May 2008. Retrieved 2009-07-01.
  36. Neitz, Maureen E. "Severity of Colorblindness Varies". Medical College of Wisconsin. Archived from the original on 5 February 2007. Retrieved 2007-04-05.
  37. Jones SA, Shim SH, He J, Zhuang X (June 2011). "Fast, three-dimensional super-resolution imaging of live cells". Nature Methods. 8 (6): 499–508. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1605. PMC 3137767. PMID 21552254.
  38. Simunovic MP (May 2010). "Colour vision deficiency". Eye. 24 (5): 747–55. doi:10.1038/eye.2009.251. PMID 19927164.
  39. Neitz J, Neitz M (April 2011). "The genetics of normal and defective color vision". Vision Research. 51 (7): 633–51. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.12.002. PMC 3075382. PMID 21167193.
  40. 1 2 3 Harrison, G.A.; Tanner, J.M.; Pilbeam, D.R.; Baker, P.T. (1988). Human Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 183–187, 287–290. ISBN 978-0-19-854144-8.
  41. Jameson KA, Highnote SM, Wasserman LM (June 2001). "Richer color experience in observers with multiple photopigment opsin genes" (PDF). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 8 (2): 244–61. doi:10.3758/BF03196159. PMID 11495112. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 February 2012. Retrieved 25 March 2017.
  42. Almutairi, Nawaf; Kundart, James; Muthuramalingam, Naganathan; Hayes, John; Citek, Karl (24 July 2017). "Assessment of Enchroma Filter for Correcting Color Vision Deficiency". Pacific University College of Optometry. 21. Archived from the original on 6 January 2019. Retrieved 5 January 2019.
  43. MacAdam, David L.; Judd, Deane B., eds. (1979). Contributions to color science. NBS. p. 584. Archived from the original on 2020-07-29. Retrieved 2020-08-07.
  44. 1 2 3 Kalloniatis, Michael; Luu, Charles (July 9, 2007). "The Perception of Color". In Kolb, Helga; Fernandez, Eduardo; Nelson, Ralph (eds.). Webvision: The Organization of the Retina and Visual System. University of Utah Health Sciences Center. PMID 21413396. {{cite book}}: |archive-url= requires |url= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (help)
  45. Simonite, Tom (December 5, 2005). "Colour blindness may have hidden advantages". Nature. doi:10.1038/news051205-1.
  46. Kleeman, Elise (March 3, 2006). "In Combat, Stick With the Color-Blind". Discover. Archived from the original on 20 December 2019. Retrieved 20 December 2019.
  47. Goldstein, E. Bruce (2007). Sensation and perception (7th ed.). Wadsworth: Thomson. p. 152. ISBN 978-0-534-55810-9.
  48. "Disease-causing Mutations and protein structure". UCL Biochemistry BSM Group. Archived from the original on 2005-05-01. Retrieved 2007-04-02.
  49. "Types of Colour Blindness". Colour Blind Awareness. Archived from the original on 2014-05-29.
  50. 1 2 Blom, Jan Dirk (2009). A Dictionary of Hallucinations. Springer. p. 4. ISBN 978-1-4419-1222-0. Archived from the original on 2016-12-27.
  51. Weiss AH, Biersdorf WR (1989). "Blue cone monochromatism". Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 26 (5): 218–23. PMID 2795409.
  52. Color Vision Deficiency Archived 2015-04-16 at the Wayback Machine. American Optometric Association
  53. Siegel IM (1981). "The X-Chrom lens. On seeing red". Survey of Ophthalmology. 25 (5): 312–24. doi:10.1016/S0039-6257(81)80001-X. PMID 6971497.
  54. Zeltzer HI (July 1979). "Use of modified X-Chrom for relief of light dazzlement and color blindness of a rod monochromat". Journal of the American Optometric Association. 50 (7): 813–8. PMID 315420.
  55. An X-Chrom manual Archived 2015-04-12 at the Wayback Machine. Artoptical.com. Retrieved on 2016-12-10.
  56. Zhou, Li. "A Scientist Accidentally Developed Sunglasses That Could Correct Color Blindness". Smithsonian. Archived from the original on 3 September 2017. Retrieved 6 January 2018.
  57. "Colour Blindness: Experience it". Colour Blind Awareness. Archived from the original on 2019-12-28. Retrieved 2019-12-11.
  58. Chan, Xin; Goh, Shi; Tan, Ngiap (2014). "Subjects with colour vision deficiency in the community: what do primary care physicians need to know?". Asia Pacific Family Medicine. 13 (1): 10. doi:10.1186/s12930-014-0010-3.
  59. Ananya, Mandal (2009-11-23). "Color Blindness Prevalence". Health. Archived from the original on 8 September 2013. Retrieved 27 February 2014.
  60. Harrison, G.A. et al. (1977): Human Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, ISBN 0-19-857164-X.
  61. Dalton J (1798). "Extraordinary facts relating to the vision of colours: with observations". Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester. 5: 28–45. OCLC 9879327.
  62. Crow, Kevin L. (2008). "Four Types of Disabilities: Their Impact on Online Learning". TechTrends. 52 (1): 51–5. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0112-6. S2CID 140955393.
  63. 1 2 Habibzadeh P (September 2016). "Our red–green world". Australian Health Review. 40 (4): 474. doi:10.1071/ah15161. PMID 26476553.
  64. Vingrys AJ, Cole BL (1986). "Origins of colour vision standards within the transport industry". Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics. 6 (4): 369–75. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.1986.tb01155.x. PMID 3306566.
  65. Mollon JD, Cavonius LR (2012). "The Lagerlunda collision and the introduction of color vision testing". Survey of Ophthalmology. 57 (2): 178–94. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2011.10.003. PMID 22301271.
  66. Meyers, Michael (2002). All in One A+ Certification Exam Guide (4th ed.). Berkeley, California: McGraw-Hill/Osborne. ISBN 978-0-07-222274-6.
  67. Grob, Bernard (2001). Basic Electronics. Columbus, Ohio: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-02-802253-6.
  68. "Answers for Pilots: Color vision". Archived from the original on 2020-08-13. Retrieved 2020-08-07.
  69. "Aerospace Medical Dispositions — Color vision". Archived from the original on 2009-05-12. Retrieved 2009-04-11.
  70. Warburton, Simon (29 May 2009). "Colour-blindness research could clear more pilots to fly: UK CAA". Air transport. Reed Business Information. Archived from the original on 2 June 2009. Retrieved 29 October 2009.
  71. Cole BL, Harris RW (September 2009). "Colour blindness does not preclude fame as an artist: celebrated Australian artist Clifton Pugh was a protanope". Clinical & Experimental Optometry. 92 (5): 421–8. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2009.00384.x. PMID 19515095.
  72. Anon. "Charles Meryon". Art Encyclopedia. The Concise Grove Dictionary of Art. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 25 November 2010. Retrieved 7 January 2010.
  73. Lee, Hyo-won (15 May 2011). "Dreams come true, Disney style". The Korea Times. Archived from the original on 30 November 2019. Retrieved 25 November 2019.
  74. "Full text of the decision of the court – in Portuguese language". Archived from the original on 2012-07-14. Retrieved 2012-03-09.
  75. "Decree issued by president of a republic ratifying Legislative Decree No. 198, of june 13, which approved the Inter-American Convention AG/RES. 1608 – in Portuguese language". Archived from the original on 2012-03-25. Retrieved 2012-03-09.
  76. "Inter-American Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Person with Disabilities". Archived from the original on 2013-04-16. Retrieved 2012-03-09.
  77. Larson, Aaron (22 May 2016). "Is Color-Blindness a Disability for Employment Under the ADA". ExpertLaw. ExpertLaw.com. Archived from the original on 15 August 2017. Retrieved 15 August 2017.
  78. "New documentary uncovers the Irish links to America's Tipperary Hill". TheJournal.ie. 6 November 2016. Archived from the original on 15 August 2017. Retrieved 15 August 2017.
  79. Zhang, Sarah. "The Story Behind Syracuse's Upside-Down Traffic Light". Gizmodo. Archived from the original on 2014-09-16.
  80. Bosten JM, Robinson JD, Jordan G, Mollon JD (December 2005). "Multidimensional scaling reveals a color dimension unique to 'color-deficient' observers" (PDF). Current Biology. 15 (23): R950-2. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.031. PMID 16332521. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-10-30. Retrieved 2020-08-07.
  81. "Colour blindness not all it seems". BBC News. 6 December 2015. Archived from the original on 23 June 2016. Retrieved 21 June 2016.
  82. Dolgin, Elie (2009). "Colour blindness corrected by gene therapy". Nature. doi:10.1038/news.2009.921.
  83. Alfredo M. Ronchi: Eculture: Cultural Content in the Digital Age. Springer (New York, 2009). p. 319 ISBN 978-3-540-75273-8
  84. "I listen to color" Archived 2012-08-12 at the Wayback Machine, Neil Harbisson at TED Global, 27 June 2012.

Further reading

  • Kaiser, Peter K.; Boynton, Robert M. (1996). Human color vision. Washington, DC: Optical Society of America. ISBN 978-1-55752-461-4. OCLC 472932250.
  • McIntyre, Donald (2002). Colour blindness: causes and effects. Chester: Dalton Publishing. ISBN 978-0-9541886-0-3. OCLC 49204679.
  • Rubin, Melvin L.; Cassin, Barbara; Solomon, Sheila (1984). Dictionary of eye terminology. Gainesville, Fla: Triad Pub. Co. ISBN 978-0-937404-07-2. OCLC 10375427.
  • Shevell, Steven K. (2003). The science of color. Amsterdam: Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-444-51251-2. OCLC 52271315.
  • Hilbert, David; Byrne, Alexander (1997). Readings on color. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-52231-1. OCLC 35762680.
  • Stiles, W. S.; Wyszecki, Günter (2000). Color science: concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-39918-6. OCLC 799532137.
  • Kuchenbecker, J.; Broschmann, D. (2014). Plates for color vision testing. New York: Thieme. ISBN 978-3-13-175481-3.
Classification
External resources
This article is issued from Offline. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.