Russian imperialism

Russian imperialism includes the policy and ideology of power exerted by Russia, as well as its antecedent states, over other countries and external territories. This includes the conquests of the Russian Empire, the imperial actions of the Soviet Union (as Russia is considered its main successor state), as well as those of the modern Russian Federation. Some postcolonial scholars have noted the lack of attention given to Russian and Soviet imperialism in the discipline.[1]

Expansion of the Grand Duchy of Moscow, Tsardom of Russia and Russian Empire between the 14th and 20th centuries.

Views on Russian imperialism

Montesquieu wrote that "The Moscovites cannot leave the empire" and they "are all slaves".[2]: 12  Historian Alexander Etkind describes a phenomenon of "reversed gradient", where people living near the center of the Russian Empire experienced greater oppression than the ones on the edges.[3]: 143–144  Jean-Jacques Rousseau in turn argued that Poland was not free because of Russian imperialism.[2]: 12  In 1836, Nikolai Gogol said that Saint Petersburg was "something similar to a European colony in America", remarking that there were as many foreigners as people of the native ethnicity.[4] According to Aleksey Khomyakov, the Russian elite was "a colony of eclectic Europeans, thrown into a country of savages" with a "colonial relationship" between the two.[5] A similar colonial aspect was identified by Konstantin Kavelin.[6]

Russian imperialism has been argued to be different from other European colonial empires due to its empire being overland rather than overseas, which meant that rebellions could be more easily put down, with some lands being reconquered soon after they were lost.[7]: 1  The terrestrial basis of the empire has also been seen as a factor which made it more divided than sea-based ones due to the difficulties of communication and transport over land at the time.[8]

Russian imperialism has been linked to the labour-intensive and low productivity economic system based on serfdom and despotic rule, which required constant increase in the amount of land under cultivation to legitimise the rule and provide satisfaction to the subjects.[2]: 17–18  The political system in turn depended on land as a resource to reward officeholder. The political elite made territorial expansion an intentional project.

Internal colonization

According to Vasily Klyuchevsky, Russia has the "history of a country that colonizes itself".[3] Vladimir Lenin saw Russia's underdeveloped territories as internal colonialism.[9] This concept had first been introduced in the context of Russia by August von Haxthausen in 1843.[10] Sergey Solovyov argued that this was because Russia "was not a colony that was separated from the metropolitan land by oceans".[11] For Afanasy Shchapov, this process was primarily driven by ecological imperialism, whereby the fur trade and fishing were driving the conquest of Siberia and Alaska.[12] Other followers of Klyuchevsky identified the forms of colonization driven by military or monastic expansion, among others.[13] Pavel Milyukov meanwhile noted the violence of this self-colonizing process.[14] A similarity was later noted between Russian self-colonialism and the American frontier by Mark Bassin.[11]

Ideologies of Russian imperialism

The territorial expansion of the empire gave the autocratic rulers of Russia additional legitimacy, while also giving the subjugated population a source of national pride.[15] The legitimation of the empire was later done through different ideologies. After the Fall of Constantinople, Moscow named itself the third Rome, following the Roman and Byzantine Empires. In a panegyric letter to Grand Duke Vasili III composed in 1510, Russian monk Philotheus (Filofey) of Pskov proclaimed, "Two Romes have fallen. The third stands. And there will be no fourth. No one shall replace your Christian Tsardom!".[16] This led to the concept of a messianic Orthodox Russian nation as the Holy Rus.[17]: 33  Russia claimed to be the protector of Orthodox Christians as it expanded into the territories of the Ottoman Empire during wars such as the Crimean War.[18]: 34 

After the victory of monarchist Coalition in 1815, Russia promulgated the Holy Alliance with Prussia and Austria to reinstate the divine right of kings and Christian values in European political life, as pursued by Alexander I under the influence of his spiritual adviser Baroness Barbara von Krüdener. It was written by the Tsar and edited by Ioannis Kapodistrias and Alexandru Sturdza.[19] In the first draft Tsar Alexander I made appeals to mysticism through a proposed unified Christian empire, with a unified imperial army, that was seen as disconcerting by the other monarchies. Following revision, a more pragmatic version of the alliance was adopted by Russia, Prussia, and Austria.[19][20] The document was called "an apocalypse of diplomacy" by French diplomat Dominique-Georges-Frédéric Dufour de Pradt.[19] The Holy Alliance was largely used to suppress internal dissent, censoring the press and shutting down parliaments as part of "The Reaction".[20]

Under Nicholas I of Russia, Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Nationality became the official state ideology.[21][22] It required the Orthodox Church to take an essential role in politics and life, required the central rule of a single autocrat or absolute ruler, and proclaimed that the Russian people were uniquely capable of unifying a large empire due to special characteristics. Similar to the broader "divine right of kings", the emperor's power would be seen as resolving any contradictions in the world and creating an ideal "celestial" order.[23] Hosking argued that the trio of "Orthodoxy, Autocracy, Nationality" had key flaws in two of its main pillars, as the church was entirely dependent and submissive to the state, and the concept of nationality was underdeveloped because many officials were Baltic German and the revolutionary ideas of nation states were a "muffled echo" in a system that relied on serfdom. In practice, this left autocracy as the only viable pillar.[22]

In the 19th century, pan-Slavism became a new legitimation theory for the empire.[24] The idea of the Russian world became a key concept and the imperial nation-building of "All-Russian" nationality was embraced by many imperial subjects (including Jews and Germans) and served as the foundation of the Empire.[25] It had first gained in political importance near the end of the 18th century as a means of legitimizing Russian imperial claims to the eastern territories of the partitioned Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth.[26] Following the January Uprising in 1863 the Russian government became extremely determined to eliminate all manifestations of separatism.[27] By the second half of the 19th century, Russian publicists adopted, and transformed, the ideology of Pan-Slavism; "convinced of their own political superiority [they] argued that all Slavs might as well merge with the Great Russians."[28]

The "Russian geography" poem by a notable 19th century Russian poet Fyodor Tyutchev was considered by philologist Roman Leibov to express ideology of the worldwide Slavic empire:[29]

Moscow and Peter's grad, the city of Constantine,
these are the capitals of Russian kingdom.
But where is their limit? And where are their frontiers
to the north, the east, the south and the setting sun?
The Fate will reveal this to future generations.
Seven inland seas and seven great rivers
from the Nile to the Neva, from the Elbe to China,
from the Volga to the Euphrates, from Ganges to the Danube.
That's the Russian Kingdom, and let it be forever,
just as the Spirit foretold and Daniel prophesied.

Russian colonial expansion
Main article: Territorial evolution of Russia
Russian expansion in Eurasia between 1533 and 1894

From the 16th century onwards Russia conquered, on average, territory the size of the Netherlands every year for 150 years. [30]

Siberia and the Far East
Main article: Russian conquest of Siberia

Russian expansionism has largely benefited from the proximity of the mostly uninhabited Siberia, which has been incrementally conquered by Russia since the reign of Ivan the Terrible (1530–1584).[31] The Russian colonization of Siberia and conquest of its indigenous peoples has been compared to European colonization of the Americas and its natives, with similar negative impacts on the natives and the appropriation of their land. Other researchers, however, consider that settlement of Siberia differed from European colonization in not resulting in native depopulation, as well as providing gainful employment and integrating indigenous population into settlers' society.[32] The North Pacific also became the target of similar expansion establishing the Russian Far East.[33]

In 1858, during the Second Opium War, Russia strengthened and eventually annexed the north bank of the Amur River and the coast down to the Korean border from China in the "Unequal Treaties" of Treaty of Aigun (1858) and the Convention of Peking (1860). During the Boxer Rebellion, the Russian Empire invaded Manchuria in 1900, and the Blagoveshchensk massacre occurred against Chinese residents on the Russian side of the border.[34][35] Furthermore, the empire at times controlled concession territories in China, notably the Chinese Eastern Railway and concessions in Tianjin and Russian Dalian.

Central Asia
Main article: Russian conquest of Central Asia

The Russian conquest of Central Asia took place over several decades. In 1847–64 they crossed the eastern Kazakh Steppe and built a line of forts along the northern border of Kyrgyzstan. In 1864–68 they moved south from Kyrgyzstan, captured Tashkent and Samarkand and dominated the Khanates of Kokand and Bokhara. The next step was to turn this triangle into a rectangle by crossing the Caspian Sea. In 1873 the Russians conquered Khiva, and in 1881 they took western Turkmenistan. In 1884 they took the Merv oasis and eastern Turkmenistan. In 1885 further expansion south toward Afghanistan was blocked by the British. In 1893–95 the Russians occupied the high Pamir Mountains in the southeast. According to historian Alexander Morrison, "Russia's expansion southwards across the Kazakh steppe into the riverine oases of Turkestan was one of the nineteenth century's most rapid and dramatic examples of imperial conquest."[36]

In the south, the Great Game was a political and diplomatic confrontation that existed for most of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century between the British Empire and the Russian Empire over Central and South Asia. Britain feared that Russia planned to invade India and that this was the goal of Russia's expansion in Central Asia, while Russia continued its conquest of Central Asia.[37] Indeed, multiple 19th-century Russian invasion plans of India are attested, including the Duhamel and Khrulev plans of the Crimean War (1853–1856), among later plans that never materialized.[38]

Historian A. I. Andreyev stated that, "in the days of the Great Game, Mongolia was an object of imperialist encroachment by Russia, as Tibet was for the British."[39] In the Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907, the Russian Empire and British Empire officially ended their Great Game rivalry to focus on opposing the German Empire, dividing Iran into British and Russian portions.[40] In 1908, the Persian Constitutional Revolution sought to establish a democratic civil society in Iran, with an elected Majilis, a relatively free press and other reforms.[41] The Russian Empire intervened in the Persian Constitutional Revolution to support the Shah and reactionary factions. The Cossacks bombarded the Majilis,[42] Russia had earlier established the Persian Cossack Brigade in 1879, a force which was led by Russian officers and served as a vehicle for Russian influence in Iran.[43]

Europe
Map of all provinces of Russian Empire, 1898.

During this epoch, Russia also followed a policy of westward expansion. Following the Swedish defeat in the Finnish War of 1808–1809 and the signing of the Treaty of Fredrikshamn on 17 September 1809, the eastern half of Sweden, the area that then became Finland, was incorporated into the Russian Empire as an autonomous grand duchy. However, the policy of Russification of Finland aimed at limiting the special status of the Grand Duchy of Finland and possibly the termination of its political autonomy and cultural uniqueness. Similar Russification policies were also pursued in Ukraine and Belarus.

In the aftermath of the Russo-Turkish War (1806–12) and the ensuing Treaty of Bucharest (1812), the eastern half of the Principality of Moldavia (which came to be known as Bessarabia), an Ottoman vassal state, and some areas formerly under direct Ottoman rule, came under the rule of the Russian Empire. At the Congress of Vienna (1815), Russia gained sovereignty over Congress Poland, which on paper was an autonomous Kingdom in personal union with Russia. However, the Russian Emperors generally disregarded any restrictions on their power. It was, therefore, little more than a puppet state.[44][45] The autonomy was severely curtailed following uprisings in 1830–31 and 1863, as the country became governed by viceroys, and later divided into governorates (provinces).[44][45]

Russian overseas expansion

Eastwards expansion was followed by the Russian colonization of North America across the Pacific Ocean. Russian promyshlenniki (trappers and hunters) quickly developed the maritime fur trade, which instigated several conflicts between the Aleuts and Russians in the 1760s. By the late 1780s, trade relations had opened with the Tlingits, and in 1799 the Russian-American Company (RAC) was formed in order to monopolize the fur trade, also serving as an imperialist vehicle for the Russification of Alaska Natives.

The Russian Empire also acquired the island of Sakhalin which was turned into one of history's largest prison colonies.[46][47] Initially, Russian maritime incursions into the waters surrounding Hokkaido began in the late eighteenth century, spurring Japan to map and explore its northern island surroundings. Sakhalin had been inhabited by indigenous peoples including Ainu, Uilta, and Nivkh, despite the island nominally paying tribute to the Qing Dynasty. After Russia acquired Manchuria from the Qing in the 1858 Treaty of Aigun, they also acquired from the Qing, a nominal claim to Sakhalin across the strait. With the earlier 1855 Treaty of Shimoda, a joint settler colony of both Russian and Japanese was temporarily created, despite conflicts. However with the 1875 Treaty of Saint Petersburg the Russian Empire was granted Sakhalin in exchange for Japan gaining the Kuril Islands.[48]

The furthest Russian colonies were in Fort Elizavety and Fort Alexander, Russian forts on the Hawaiian islands, built in the early 19th century by the Russian-American Company as the result of an alliance with High Chief Kaumualiʻi, as well as in Sagallo, a short-lived Russian settlement established in 1889 on the Gulf of Tadjoura in French Somaliland (modern-day Djibouti). The southernmost settlement established in North America was at Fort Ross, California.

Soviet imperialism
A Stalinist era Soviet poster with the inscription "The whole world will be ours!"
Main article: Soviet Empire

Although the Soviet Union declared itself anti-imperialist, it exhibited tendencies common to historic empires.[49][50][51] This argument is traditionally held to have originated in Richard Pipes's book The Formation of the Soviet Union (1954).[52] Several scholars, such as Seweryn Bialer, hold that the Soviet Union was a hybrid entity containing elements common to both multinational empires and nation states.[49][50][53] It has also been argued that the Soviet Union practiced colonialism similar to conventional imperial powers.[51][54][55] Maoists argued that the Soviet Union had itself become an imperialist power while maintaining a socialist façade, or social imperialism.[56][57]

Soviet imperial ideology

The Soviet ideology continued the messianism of Pan-Slavism which placed Russia as a special nation.[58] While proletarian internationalism was originally embraced by the Bolshevik Party during its seizure of power in the Russian Revolution, after the formation of the Soviet Union, Marxist proponents of internationalism suggested that the country could be used as a "homeland of communism" from which revolution could be spread around the globe.[59][60] Joseph Stalin and Nikolai Bukharin encouraged this turn towards national communism in 1924, away from the classical Marxism position of global socialism. According to Alexander Wendt, this "evolved into an ideology of control rather than revolution under the rubric of socialist internationalism" within the Soviet Union.[61]: 704 

Under Leonid Brezhnev, the policy of "Developed Socialism" declared the Soviet Union to be the most complete socialist country—other countries were "socialist", but the USSR was "developed socialist"—explaining its dominant role and hegemony over the other socialist countries.[62] Brezhnev also formulated and implemented the interventionist Brezhnev doctrine, permitting the invasion of other socialist countries, which was characterised as imperial.[63] Alongside this Brezhnev also implemented a policy of cultural Russification as part of Developed Socialism, which sought to assert more central control.[63] This was a dimension of Soviet cultural imperialism, which involved the Sovietization of culture and education at the expense of local traditions.[64]

Central Asia
Republics of the Soviet Union, 1989

The Soviets pursued internal colonialism in Central Asia.[65] From the 1930s through the 1950s, Joseph Stalin ordered population transfers in the Soviet Union, deporting people (often entire nationalities) to underpopulated remote areas. Transfers from the Caucasus to Central Asia included the Deportation of the Balkars, Deportation of the Chechens and Ingush, Deportation of the Crimean Tatars, the Deportation of the Karachays, and the Deportation of the Meskhetian Turks. Many European Soviet citizens and much of Russia's industry were relocated to Kazakhstan during World War II, when Nazi armies threatened to capture all the European industrial centers of the Soviet Union. These migrants founded mining towns which quickly grew to become major industrial centers such as Karaganda (1934), Zhezkazgan (1938), Temirtau (1945) and Ekibastuz (1948). In 1955, the town of Baikonur was built to support the Baikonur Cosmodrome. Many more Russians arrived in the years 1953–1965, during the so-called Virgin Lands Campaign of Soviet general secretary Nikita Khrushchev. Still more settlers came in the late 1960s and 70s, when the government paid bonuses to workers participating in a program to relocate Soviet industry close to the extensive coal, gas, and oil deposits of Central Asia. By 1979 ethnic Russians in Kazakhstan numbered about 5,500,000, almost 40% of the total population.

Soviet expansionism

Despite early support for self-determination, the Bolsheviks reconquered most of the Russian Empire during the Russian Civil War.[2]: 40  The early Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic annexed by force the following states:

From the 1919 Karakhan Manifesto to 1927, diplomats of the Soviet Union would promise to revoke concessions in China, but the Soviets kept tsarist concessions such as the Chinese Eastern Railway as part of secret negotiations 1924-1925.[66][67] This played a role in leading to the 1929 Sino-Soviet conflict, which the Soviets won and reaffirmed their control over the railway,[68] the railway was returned in 1952.[66]

In 1939, the USSR entered into the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact with Nazi Germany[69] that contained a secret protocol that divided Romania, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and Finland into German and Soviet spheres of influence.[69][70] Eastern Poland, Latvia, Estonia, Finland and Bessarabia in northern Romania were recognized as parts of the Soviet sphere of influence.[70] Lithuania was added in a second secret protocol in September 1939.[71]

The Soviet Union had invaded the portions of eastern Poland assigned to it by the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact two weeks after the German invasion of western Poland, followed by co-ordination with German forces in Poland.[72][73] During the Occupation of East Poland by the Soviet Union, the Soviets liquidated the Polish state, and a German-Soviet meeting addressed the future structure of the "Polish region".[74] Soviet authorities immediately started a campaign of sovietization[75][76] of the newly Soviet-annexed areas.[77][78][79]

In 1939, the Soviet Union unsuccessfully attempted an invasion of Finland,[80] subsequent to which the parties entered into an interim peace treaty granting the Soviet Union the eastern region of Karelia (10% of Finnish territory),[80] and the Karelo-Finnish Soviet Socialist Republic was established by merging the ceded territories with the KASSR. After a June 1940 Soviet Ultimatum demanding Bessarabia, Northern Bukovina, and the Hertsa region from Romania,[81][82] the Soviets entered these areas, Romania caved to Soviet demands and the Soviets occupied the territories.[81][83]

In September and October 1939 the Soviet government compelled the much smaller Baltic states to conclude mutual assistance pacts which gave the Soviets the right to establish military bases there. Following invasion by the Red Army in the summer of 1940, Soviet authorities compelled the Baltic governments to resign. Under Soviet supervision, new puppet communist governments and fellow travelers arranged rigged elections with falsified results.[84] Shortly thereafter, the newly elected "people's assemblies" passed resolutions requesting admission into the Soviet Union. After the invasion in 1940 the repressions followed with the mass deportations carried out by the Soviets.

By the end of World War II the Soviet Union had also annexed:

At the end of World War II, most eastern and central European countries were occupied by the Soviet Union,[86] known as “European colonies”, while remaining independent though their politics, military, foreign and domestic policies were dominated by the Soviet Union.[87] Soviet satellite states in Europe included:[88][89][90][91]

The Democratic Republic of Afghanistan can also be considered a Soviet satellite; from 1978 until 1991, the central government in Kabul was aligned with the Eastern Bloc, and was directly supported by Soviet military between 1979 and 1989. The Mongolian People's Republic was also a Soviet satellite from 1924 to 1991.[92] Other Asian Soviet satellite states included the Chinese Soviet Republic in Jiangxi province, the Tuvan People's Republic, and the East Turkestan Republic.

Contemporary Russian imperialism
See also: Putinism, Russia under Vladimir Putin, and Ruscism
Current Russia's president Vladimir Putin has compared himself to Peter the Great in an effort to regain the former Russian lands.[93]

The Russian Federation is the primary recognized successor state to the Soviet Union and it has been accused of trying to bring back post-Soviet states under its rule.[94] Almost all the states initially formed the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and most later also joined the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO). The Union State with Belarus was an even stronger form of integration with Russia. Other forms of integration included the economic initiatives of the Eurasian Economic Union and Eurasian Customs Union.

In the political language of Russia and some other post-Soviet states, the term near abroad refers to the independent republics that emerged after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Increasing usage of the term in English is connected to assertions of Russia's right to maintain significant influence in the region.[95][96][97] Russian President Vladimir Putin has declared the region to be a component of Russia's "sphere of influence", and strategically vital to Russian interests.[97] The concept has been compared to the Monroe Doctrine.[95]

The annexation of Crimea led to a new wave of Russian nationalism, with large parts of the Russian far right movement aspiring to annex even more land from Ukraine, including the unrecognized Novorossiya.[98] Analyst Vladimir Socor proposed that Russian president Vladimir Putin's speech after the annexation of Crimea was a de facto "manifesto of Greater-Russia Irredentism".[99] After the event in Crimea, the Transnistrian authorities requested Russia to annex Transnistria, a breakaway region of Moldova.[100]

Contemporary Russian imperialist ideologies

The contemporary Eurasianist ideology was influenced by political theorist Aleksandr Dugin's 1997 Foundations of Geopolitics and the Eurasia Party he later founded on the Russian political scene. Political scientist Anton Shekhovtsov defines Dugin's version of Neo-Eurasianism as "a form of a fascist ideology centred on the idea of revolutionising the Russian society and building a totalitarian, Russia-dominated Eurasian Empire that would challenge and eventually defeat its eternal adversary represented by the United States and its Atlanticist allies, thus bringing about a new ‘golden age’ of global political and cultural illiberalism".[101] This ideology was used to justify Russian imperialist aggression against Ukraine.[102]

Contemporary Russian expansionism
Territories occupied by Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union
Map showing the Russian Federation in dark red and its occupied territories in Europe in light red. They are, from left to right, Transnistria, annexed Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

Contemporary Russian-occupied territories include Transnistria (taken from Moldova); Abkhazia and South Ossetia (taken from Georgia); and some part of the territory of Ukraine. Additionally, the four southernmost Kuril Islands are considered by Japan and several other countries to be occupied by Russia.

On 24 February 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine on a much greater scale than in 2014,[103] which is seen as a continuation of Russia's irredentism at the expense of Ukraine.[104] On 27 March 2022, Leonid Pasechnik leader of the LPR said that the Luhansk People's Republic might hold a referendum to join Russia.[105] On 29 March, Denis Pushilin leader of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic talked about a similar possibility.[106]

On 30 March 2022, South Ossetian President Anatoly Bibilov announced his intention to begin legal proceedings for the territory to accede to the Russian Federation. South Ossetia is a self-proclaimed republic, and the majority of United Nations member countries consider it to be part of Georgia, while Russia is one of the few countries that recognize South Ossetia.[107][108]

In September 2022, a series of annexation referendums took place in Russian-occupied Ukraine, conducted by Russian occupation authorities. Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, signed what he called "accession treaties" proclaiming the Russian annexation of Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia oblasts on 30 September 2022. The referendums, as well as the annexation, were condemned as illegitimate by the international community.[109][110]

See also

References
  1. Etkind 2013, p. 26.
  2. Herpen, Marcel H. van (2014). Putin's wars : the rise of Russia's new imperialism. Lanham, Maryland. ISBN 9781442231368.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  3. Etkind, Alexander (2013-04-29). Internal Colonization: Russia's Imperial Experience (Kindle ed.). John Wiley & Sons. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-7456-7354-7.
  4. Etkind 2013, p. 17.
  5. Etkind 2013, p. 17-18.
  6. Etkind 2013, p. 19.
  7. Herpen, Marcel H. Van (2015-07-01). Putin's Wars: The Rise of Russia's New Imperialism (Kindle ed.). Rowman & Littlefield. p. 10. ISBN 978-1-4422-5359-9.
  8. Etkind 2013, p. 5.
  9. Etkind 2013, p. 20.
  10. Etkind 2013, p. 61.
  11. Etkind 2013, p. 63.
  12. Etkind 2013, p. 66.
  13. Etkind 2013, p. 68.
  14. Etkind 2013, p. 69.
  15. Herpen 2015, p. 29.
  16. Mashkov, A.D. Moscow is the Third Rome (МОСКВА – ТРЕТІЙ РИМ). Ukrainian Soviet Encyclopedia.
  17. Herpen 2015, p. 55.
  18. Herpen 2015, p. 56.
  19. Zorin, A. L. (Andrei L.); Schlafly, Daniel L (2003). ""Star of the East": The Holy Alliance and European Mysticism". Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History. 4 (2): 313–342. doi:10.1353/kri.2003.0031. ISSN 1538-5000. S2CID 159997980.
  20. Nations, United. "Three Lessons of Peace: From the Congress of Vienna to the Ukraine Crisis". United Nations. Retrieved 2022-05-03.
  21. Riasanovsky, Nicholas V. (1960). ""Nationality" in the State Ideology during the Reign of Nicholas I". The Russian Review. 19 (1): 38–46. doi:10.2307/126191. ISSN 0036-0341. JSTOR 126191.
  22. Hosking, Geoffrey A.; Hosking, Emeritus Professor of Russian History Geoffrey (1997). Russia: People and Empire, 1552-1917. Harvard University Press. pp. 146–147. ISBN 978-0-674-78118-4.
  23. Chubarov, Alexander (2001-01-01). Russia's Bitter Path to Modernity: A History of the Soviet and Post-Soviet Eras. A&C Black. pp. 36–37. ISBN 978-0-8264-1350-5.
  24. Herpen 2015, p. 58.
  25. Ilnytzkyj, Oleh S. (1996). "Culture and the Demise of the Russian Empire". In Zezulka-Mailloux, Gabrielle Eva Marie; Gifford, James (eds.). Culture + the State: Nationalisms. CRC. p. 127. ISBN 9781551951492. Since the second-half of the nineteenth century the state sponsored all-Russian national identity was embraced by many imperial subjects (Jews, Germans, Ukrainians) and served as the bedrock of the Empire. By the early twentieth century the idea of a triune Russian nation was deeply entrenched among ethnic Russians.
  26. Miller, Alexei (2003). A Testament of the All-Russian Idea. Central European University Press. pp. 234–235. ISBN 9789639241367.
  27. Magocsi, Paul Robert (2010). A History of Ukraine: A Land and Its Peoples. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. pp. 392–395. ISBN 9781442640856.
  28. Magocsi, Paul Robert (2010). A History of Ukraine: A Land and Its Peoples. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. pp. 392–395. ISBN 9781442640856.
  29. Leibov, Roman (2012). "2.1.3. "Русская география" Ф. И. Тютчева" [2.1.3. "Russian geography" by F.I. Tyutchev] (PDF). In Lyubov, Kiseleva (ed.). "Идеологическая география" Российской империи: пространство, границы, обитатели ["Ideological geography" of the Russian empire] (in Russian). Tartu. p. 192.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  30. Herpen 2015, p. 28.
  31. Herpen 2015, p. 26.
  32. Batalden 1997, pp. 36-37.
  33. Sablin, Ivan; Sukhan, Daniel (2018). "Regionalisms and Imperialisms in the Making of the Russian Far East, 1903–1926". Slavic Review. 77 (2): 333–357. doi:10.1017/slr.2018.126. ISSN 0037-6779. S2CID 165426403.
  34. Lin, Yuexin Rachel (2017). "White water, Red tide: Sino-Russian conflict on the Amur 1917–20". Historical Research. 90 (247): 76–100. doi:10.1111/1468-2281.12166. hdl:10871/31582. ISSN 1468-2281.
  35. Zatsepine, Victor (2017-03-09). Beyond the Amur: Frontier Encounters between China and Russia, 1850–1930. UBC Press. ISBN 978-0-7748-3412-4.
  36. Morrison, Alexander (2014-04-03). "Introduction: Killing the Cotton Canard and getting rid of the Great Game: rewriting the Russian conquest of Central Asia, 1814–1895". Central Asian Survey. 33 (2): 131–142. doi:10.1080/02634937.2014.915614. ISSN 0263-4937. S2CID 145275907.
  37. "The Great Game, 1856-1907: Russo-British Relations in Central and East Asia | Reviews in History". reviews.history.ac.uk. Retrieved 2021-08-09.
  38. Korbel, Josef (1966). Danger in Kashmir. Princeton, N.J. p. 277. ISBN 978-1-4008-7523-8. OCLC 927444240.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  39. Andreev, A. I. (2003). Soviet Russia and Tibet : the debacle of secret diplomacy, 1918-1930s. Leiden: Brill. p. 96. ISBN 90-04-12952-9. OCLC 51330174.
  40. Meyer, Karl E. (1987-08-10). "Opinion | The Editorial Notebook; Persia: The Great Game Goes On". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2021-10-24.
  41. Meyer, Karl E. (1987-08-10). "Opinion | The Editorial Notebook; Persia: The Great Game Goes On". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2021-10-24.
  42. Middle East conflicts from Ancient Egypt to the 21st century : an encyclopedia and document collection. Spencer Tucker, Priscilla Mary Roberts. Santa Barbara, California. 2019. ISBN 978-1-4408-5353-1. OCLC 1099541849.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link)
  43. Andreeva, Elena (2007). Russia and Iran in the great game : travelogues and Orientalism. London: Routledge. pp. 63–76. ISBN 978-0-203-96220-6. OCLC 166422396.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  44. Nicolson, Harold George (2001). The Congress of Vienna: A Study in Allied Unity, 1812–1822. New York: Grove Press. p. 171. ISBN 0-8021-3744-X.
  45. Palmer, Alan Warwick (1997). Twilight of the Habsburgs: The Life and Times of Emperor Francis Joseph. Boston: Atlantic Monthly Press. p. 7. ISBN 0-87113-665-1.
  46. Doroshevich, Vlas (2011). Russia's Penal Colony in the Far East: A Translation of Vlas Doroshevich's "Sakhalin". Anthem Press. ISBN 978-0-85728-391-7.
  47. Gentes, Andrew A. (2021-07-29). Russia's Sakhalin Penal Colony, 1849–1917: Imperialism and Exile. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-000-37859-7.
  48. Paichadze, Svetlana; Seaton, Philip A. (2015-02-20). "Japanese society on Karafuto". Voices from the Shifting Russo-Japanese Border: Karafuto / Sakhalin. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-61889-8.
  49. Beissinger, Mark R. (2006). "Soviet Empire as "Family Resemblance"". Slavic Review. 65 (2): 294–303. doi:10.2307/4148594. ISSN 0037-6779. JSTOR 4148594. S2CID 156553569.
  50. Dave, Bhavna (2007-09-13). Kazakhstan - Ethnicity, Language and Power. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203014899. ISBN 978-1-134-32498-9.
  51. Caroe, O. (1953). "Soviet Colonialism in Central Asia". Foreign Affairs. 32 (1): 135–144. doi:10.2307/20031013. JSTOR 20031013.
  52. Bekus, Nelly (2010). Struggle Over Identity: The Official and the Alternative "Belarusianness". p. 4.
  53. Noren, Dag Wincens (1990). The Soviet Union and eastern Europe: considerations in a political transformation of the Soviet bloc. Amherst, Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Amherst. pp. 27–38.
  54. Annus, Epp (2019). Soviet Postcolonial Studies: A View from the Western Borderlands. Routledge. pp. 43–48. ISBN 978-0367-2345-4-6.
  55. Cucciolla, Riccardo (23 March 2019). "The Cotton Republic: Colonial Practices in Soviet Uzbekistan?". Central Eurasian Studies Society. Archived from the original on 15 January 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2019.
  56. Szymanski, Albert (1977). "Soviet Social Imperialism, Myth or Reality: An Empirical Examination of the Chinese Thesis". Berkeley Journal of Sociology. 22: 131–166. ISSN 0067-5830. JSTOR 41035250.
  57. "The Soviet Union: Is it the Nazi Germany of Today?". www.marxists.org. 1977. Retrieved 2021-09-29.
  58. Herpen 2015, p. 66.
  59. Schwarzmantle, John (2017). Breuilly, John (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 643–651. ISBN 978-0198768203.
  60. Johnson, Elliott; Walker, David; Gray, Daniel (2014). Historical Dictionary of Marxism. Historical Dictionaries of Religions, Philosophies, and Movements (2nd ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 294. ISBN 978-1-4422-3798-8.
  61. Wendt, Alexander; Friedheim, Daniel (1995). "Hierarchy under anarchy: informal empire and the East German state". International Organization. 49 (4): 689–721. doi:10.1017/S0020818300028484. ISSN 1531-5088. S2CID 145236865.
  62. Sandle, Mark (2002), Bacon, Edwin; Sandle, Mark (eds.), "Brezhnev and Developed Socialism: The Ideology of Zastoi?", Brezhnev Reconsidered, Studies in Russian and East European History and Society, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 165–187, doi:10.1057/9780230501089_8, ISBN 978-0-230-50108-9, retrieved 2021-05-30
  63. Roberts, Jason A. (2015). The Anti-Imperialist Empire: Soviet Nationality Policies under Brezhnev (PhD dissertation). West Virginia University. doi:10.33915/etd.6514.
  64. Tsvetkova, Natalia (2013). Failure of American and Soviet Cultural Imperialism in German Universities, 1945-1990. Boston, Leiden: Brill.
  65. Loring, Benjamin (2014). ""Colonizers with Party Cards": Soviet Internal Colonialism in Central Asia, 1917–39". Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History. 15 (1): 77–102. doi:10.1353/kri.2014.0012. ISSN 1538-5000. S2CID 159664992.
  66. Elleman, Bruce A. (1994). "The Soviet Union's Secret Diplomacy Concerning the Chinese Eastern Railway, 1924–1925". The Journal of Asian Studies. 53 (2): 459–486. doi:10.2307/2059842. ISSN 0021-9118. JSTOR 2059842. S2CID 162586404.
  67. Elleman, Bruce A. (1997). Diplomacy and Deception: The Secret History of Sino-Soviet Diplomatic Relations, 1917-1927. M.E. Sharpe. pp. 134, 165, 168, 174. ISBN 978-0-7656-0142-1.
  68. Walker, Michael M. (2017). The 1929 Sino-Soviet war : the war nobody knew. Lawrence, Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-2375-4. OCLC 966274204.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  69. Encyclopædia Britannica, German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact, 2008
  70. Text of the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact Archived 14 November 2014 at the Wayback Machine, executed 23 August 1939
  71. Christie, Kenneth, Historical Injustice and Democratic Transition in Eastern Asia and Northern Europe: Ghosts at the Table of Democracy, RoutledgeCurzon, 2002, ISBN 0-7007-1599-1
  72. Roberts 2006, p. 43
  73. Sanford, George (2005), Katyn and the Soviet Massacre Of 1940: Truth, Justice And Memory, London, New York: Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-33873-8
  74. Nekrich, Ulam & Freeze 1997, p. 131
  75. Adam Sudol, ed. (1998), Sowietyzacja Kresów Wschodnich II Rzeczypospolitej po 17 wrzesnia 1939 (in Polish), Bydgoszcz: Wyzsza Szkola Pedagogiczna, p. 441, ISBN 978-83-7096-281-4
  76. Myron Weiner, Sharon Stanton Russell, ed. (2001), "Stalinist Forced Relocation Policies", Demography and National Security, Berghahn Books, pp. 308–315, ISBN 978-1-57181-339-8
  77. The Soviets organized staged elections,(in Polish) Bartlomiej Kozlowski Wybory" do Zgromadzen Ludowych Zachodniej Ukrainy i Zachodniej Bialorusi Archived 23 September 2009 at the Wayback Machine, NASK, 2005, Polska.pl, the result of which was to become a legitimization of Soviet annexation of eastern Poland. Jan Tomasz Gross, Revolution from Abroad Archived 27 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine, Princeton University Press, 2003, page 396 ISBN 0-691-09603-1
  78. Soviet authorities attempted to erase Polish history and culture, Trela-Mazur, Elzbieta, Sowietyzacja oswiaty w Malopolsce Wschodniej pod radziecka okupacja 1939–1941 (Sovietization of Education in Eastern Lesser Poland During the Soviet Occupation 1939–1941), ed. Wlodzimierz Bonusiak, et al. (eds.), Wyzsza Szkola Pedagogiczna im. Jana Kochanowskiego, 1997, ISBN 978-83-7133-100-8
  79. Soviet authorities withdrew the Polish currency without exchanging rubles,(in Polish), Karolina Lanckoronska Wspomnienia wojenne; 22 IX 1939 – 5 IV 1945, 2001, ed, page 364, Chapter I – Lwów Archived 27 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine, ZNAK, ISBN 83-240-0077-1
  80. Kennedy-Pip, Caroline (1995), Stalin's Cold War, Manchester University Press, ISBN 978-0-7190-4201-0
  81. Roberts 2006, p. 55
  82. Shirer 1990, p. 794
  83. The occupation accompanied religious persecution during the Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina and Soviet deportations from Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina.
  84. Attitudes of Major Soviet Nationalities. Volume II. The Baltics, Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1973/ (Archived copy). Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  85. Laurențiu Cristian, Dumitru (2012). "Romanian-Soviet disputes regarding the maritime boundary delimitation during the postwar period" (PDF). Black Sea: History, Diplomacy, Policies and Strategies. 1: 41–43. ISBN 9788890730207.
  86. Wettig 2008, p. 69
  87. Vladimir Tismaneanu, Marius Stan, Cambridge University Press, 17 May, 2018, Romania Confronts Its Communist Past: Democracy, Memory, and Moral Justice, p. 132
  88. Rao 2006, p. 280
  89. Langley 2006, p. 30
  90. Merkl 2004, p. 53
  91. Rajagopal 2003, p. 75
  92. Sik, Ko Swan (1990). Nationality and International Law in Asian Perspective. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. p. 39. ISBN 978-0-7923-0876-8.
  93. "Putin compares himself to Peter the Great over drive to 'take back Russian land'". Euronews. 10 June 2022.
  94. Van Herpen 2013, p. 93.
  95. William Safire (1994-05-22). "ON LANGUAGE; The Near Abroad". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-04-18.
  96. Robert Kagan (2008-02-06). "New Europe, Old Russia". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-04-18.
  97. Steven Erlanger (2001-02-25). "The World; Learning to Fear Putin's Gaze". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-04-18.
  98. Casey Michael (19 June 2015). "Pew Survey: Irredentism Alive and Well in Russia". The Diplomat.
  99. Vladimir Socor. "Putin's Crimea Speech: A Manifesto of Greater-Russia Irredentism". Vol. 11, no. 56. Eurasia Daily Monitor.
  100. Bocharova, Svetlana; Biryukova, Liliya (18 March 2014). "Приднестровье как Крым" [Transnistria as Crimea]. Vedomosti (in Russian). Archived from the original on 11 December 2021. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
  101. Shekhovtsov, Anton (2018) Russia and the Western Far Right: Tango Noir, Abingdon, Routledge, p. 43.
  102. Alex; Ross, er Reid; Burley, Shane (2022-03-05). "Into the Irrational Core of Pure Violence: On the Convergence of neo-Eurasianism and the Kremlin's War in Ukraine". The New Fascism Syllabus. Retrieved 2022-03-12.
  103. "Ukraine conflict: Russian forces attack after Putin TV declaration". BBC News. 24 February 2022. Archived from the original on 24 February 2022. Retrieved 24 February 2022.
  104. Paul Hensel, Sara Mitchell, Andrew Owsiak (March 4, 2022). "Russian irredentist claims are a threat to global peace". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 31, 2022.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  105. AFP (March 27, 2022). "Leader of east Ukraine separatist region says it may hold vote on joining Russia". Times of Israel.
  106. Humphries, Conor (29 March 2022). Trevelyan, Mark (ed.). "Russia-backed Donetsk Republic may consider joining Russia - leader". Reuters.
  107. "Breakaway Georgian Region Seeks to Be Putin's Next Annexation". Bloomberg. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  108. "South Ossetia profile". BBC News. 8 March 2023. Retrieved 18 April 2023. South Ossetia seceded from Georgia in 1992 and proclaimed itself an independent republic. Georgia and the vast majority of UN countries do not recognize this independence. [...] Moscow subsequently recognised South Ossetia as an independent state
  109. Polityuk, Pavel (24 September 2022). "Russia holds annexation votes; Ukraine says residents coerced". Reuters. Retrieved 18 September 2023.
  110. Sauer, Pjotr; Harding, Luke (30 September 2022). "Putin annexes four regions of Ukraine in major escalation of Russia's war". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 September 2023.

Sources
  • Langley, Andrew (2006). The Collapse of the Soviet Union: The End of an Empire. Compass Point Books. ISBN 0-7565-2009-6.
  • Merkl, Peter H. (2004). German Unification. Penn State Press. ISBN 0-271-02566-2.
  • Nekrich, Aleksandr Moiseevich; Ulam, Adam Bruno; Freeze, Gregory L. (1997). Pariahs, Partners, Predators: German–Soviet Relations, 1922–1941. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-10676-4.
  • Rajagopal, Balakrishnan (2003). International law from below: development, social movements, and Third World resistance. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-01671-1.
  • Rao, B. V. (2006). History of Modern Europe Ad 1789–2002: A.D. 1789–2002. Sterling Publishers. ISBN 1-932705-56-2.
  • Roberts, Geoffrey (2006). Stalin's Wars: From World War to Cold War, 1939–1953. Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-11204-1.
  • Shirer, William L. (1990). The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-671-72868-7.
  • Van Herpen, Marcel H. (2013). Putinism: The Slow Rise of a Radical Right Regime in Russia. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9781137282811.
  • Wettig, Gerhard (2008). Stalin and the Cold War in Europe. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-5542-6.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.