Ebola

Onset

The length of time between exposure to the virus and the development of symptoms (incubation period) is between two and 21 days,^[1][19] and usually between four and ten days.^[20] However, recent estimates based on mathematical models predict that around 5% of cases may take greater than 21 days to develop.^[21]

Symptoms usually begin with a sudden influenza-like stage characterised by feeling tired, fever, weakness, decreased appetite, muscular pain, joint pain, headache, and sore throat.^{[1][20][22][23]} The fever is usually higher than 38.3 °C (101 °F).^[24] This is often followed by nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, and sometimes hiccups.^[23][25] The combination of severe vomiting and diarrhoea often leads to severe dehydration.^[26] Next, shortness of breath and chest pain may occur, along with swelling, headaches, and confusion.^[23] In about half of the cases, the skin may develop a maculopapular rash, a flat red area covered with small bumps, five to seven days after symptoms begin.^[20][24]

Bleeding

In some cases, internal and external bleeding may occur.^[1] This typically begins five to seven days after the first symptoms.^[27] All infected people show some decreased blood clotting.^[24] Bleeding from mucous membranes or from sites of needle punctures has been reported in 40–50% of cases.^[28] This may cause vomiting blood, coughing up of blood, or blood in stool.^[29] Bleeding into the skin may create petechiae, purpura, ecchymoses or haematomas (especially around needle injection sites).^[30] Bleeding into the whites of the eyes may also occur.^[31] Heavy bleeding is uncommon; if it occurs, it is usually in the gastrointestinal tract.^[32] The incidence of bleeding into the gastrointestinal tract was reported to be ~58% in the 2001 outbreak in Gabon,^[33] but in the 2014-15 outbreak in the US it was ~18%,^[34] possibly due to improved prevention of disseminated intravascular coagulation.^[26]

Recovery and death

Recovery may begin between seven and 14 days after first symptoms.^[23] Death, if it occurs, follows typically six to sixteen days from first symptoms and is often due to low blood pressure from fluid loss.^[2] In general, bleeding often indicates a worse outcome, and blood loss may result in death.^[22] People are often in a coma near the end of life.^[23]

Those who survive often have ongoing muscular and joint pain, liver inflammation, and decreased hearing, and may have continued tiredness, continued weakness, decreased appetite, and difficulty returning to pre-illness weight.^[23][35] Problems with vision may develop.^[36]

Survivors develop antibodies against Ebola that last at least 10 years, but it is unclear whether they are immune to additional infections.^[37]

Virology

Electron micrograph of an Ebola virus virion

Ebolaviruses contain single-stranded, non-infectious RNA genomes.^[42] Ebolavirus genomes contain seven genes including 3'-UTR-NP-VP35-VP40-GP-VP30-VP24-L-5'-UTR.^[30][43] The genomes of the five different ebolaviruses (BDBV, EBOV, RESTV, SUDV and TAFV) differ in sequence and the number and location of gene overlaps. As with all filoviruses, ebolavirus virions are filamentous particles that may appear in the shape of a shepherd's crook, of a "U" or of a "6," and they may be coiled, toroid or branched.^[43][44] In general, ebolavirions are 80 nanometers (nm) in width and may be as long as 14,000 nm.^[45]

Their life cycle is thought to begin with a virion attaching to specific cell-surface receptors such as C-type lectins, DC-SIGN, or integrins, which is followed by fusion of the viral envelope with cellular membranes.^[46] The virions taken up by the cell then travel to acidic endosomes and lysosomes where the viral envelope glycoprotein GP is cleaved.^[46] This processing appears to allow the virus to bind to cellular proteins enabling it to fuse with internal cellular membranes and release the viral nucleocapsid.^[46] The Ebolavirus structural glycoprotein (known as GP1,2) is responsible for the virus' ability to bind to and infect targeted cells.^[47] The viral RNA polymerase, encoded by the L gene, partially uncoats the nucleocapsid and transcribes the genes into positive-strand mRNAs, which are then translated into structural and nonstructural proteins. The most abundant protein produced is the nucleoprotein, whose concentration in the host cell determines when L switches from gene transcription to genome replication. Replication of the viral genome results in full-length, positive-strand antigenomes that are, in turn, transcribed into genome copies of negative-strand virus progeny.^[48] Newly synthesised structural proteins and genomes self-assemble and accumulate near the inside of the cell membrane. Virions bud off from the cell, gaining their envelopes from the cellular membrane from which they bud. The mature progeny particles then infect other cells to repeat the cycle. The genetics of the Ebola virus are difficult to study because of EBOV's virulent characteristics.^[49]

Transmission

Life cycles of the Ebolavirus

An illustration of safe burial practices

It is believed that between people, Ebola disease spreads only by direct contact with the blood or other body fluids of a person who has developed symptoms of the disease.^[50][51][52] Body fluids that may contain Ebola viruses include saliva, mucus, vomit, feces, sweat, tears, breast milk, urine and semen.^[5][37] The WHO states that only people who are very sick are able to spread Ebola disease in saliva, and the virus has not been reported to be transmitted through sweat. Most people spread the virus through blood, feces and vomit.^[53] Entry points for the virus include the nose, mouth, eyes, open wounds, cuts and abrasions.^[37] Ebola may be spread through large droplets; however, this is believed to occur only when a person is very sick.^[54] This contamination can happen if a person is splashed with droplets.^[54] Contact with surfaces or objects contaminated by the virus, particularly needles and syringes, may also transmit the infection.^[55][56] The virus is able to survive on objects for a few hours in a dried state, and can survive for a few days within body fluids outside of a person.^[37][57]

The Ebola virus may be able to persist for more than three months in the semen after recovery, which could lead to infections via sexual intercourse.^[5][58][59] Virus persistence in semen for over a year has been recorded in a national screening programme.^[60] Ebola may also occur in the breast milk of women after recovery, and it is not known when it is safe to breastfeed again.^[6] The virus was also found in the eye of one patient in 2014, two months after it was cleared from his blood.^[61] Otherwise, people who have recovered are not infectious.^[55]

The potential for widespread infections in countries with medical systems capable of observing correct medical isolation procedures is considered low.^[62] Usually when someone has symptoms of the disease, they are unable to travel without assistance.^[63]

Dead bodies remain infectious; thus, people handling human remains in practices such as traditional burial rituals or more modern processes such as embalming are at risk.^[62] 69% of the cases of Ebola infections in Guinea during the 2014 outbreak are believed to have been contracted via unprotected (or unsuitably protected) contact with infected corpses during certain Guinean burial rituals.^[64][65]

Health-care workers treating people with Ebola are at greatest risk of infection.^[55] The risk increases when they do not have appropriate protective clothing such as masks, gowns, gloves and eye protection; do not wear it properly; or handle contaminated clothing incorrectly.^[55] This risk is particularly common in parts of Africa where the disease mostly occurs and health systems function poorly.^[66] There has been transmission in hospitals in some African countries that reuse hypodermic needles.^[67][68] Some health-care centres caring for people with the disease do not have running water.^[69] In the United States the spread to two medical workers treating infected patients prompted criticism of inadequate training and procedures.^[70]

Human-to-human transmission of EBOV through the air has not been reported to occur during EVD outbreaks,^[4] and airborne transmission has only been demonstrated in very strict laboratory conditions, and then only from pigs to primates, but not from primates to primates.^[50][56] Spread of EBOV by water, or food other than bushmeat, has not been observed.^[55][56] No spread by mosquitos or other insects has been reported.^[55] Other possible methods of transmission are being studied.^[57]

Airborne transmission among humans is theoretically possible due to the presence of Ebola virus particles in saliva, which can be discharged into the air with a cough or sneeze, but observational data from previous epidemics suggests the actual risk of airborne transmission is low.^[71] A number of studies examining airborne transmission broadly concluded that transmission from pigs to primates could happen without direct contact because, unlike humans and primates, pigs with EVD get very high ebolavirus concentrations in their lungs, and not their bloodstream.^[72] Therefore, pigs with EVD can spread the disease through droplets in the air or on the ground when they sneeze or cough.^[73] By contrast, humans and other primates accumulate the virus throughout their body and specifically in their blood, but not very much in their lungs.^[73] It is believed that this is the reason researchers have observed pig to primate transmission without physical contact, but no evidence has been found of primates being infected without actual contact, even in experiments where infected and uninfected primates shared the same air.^[72][73]

Initial case

Bushmeat having been smoked in Ghana. In Africa, wild animals including fruit bats are hunted for food and are referred to as bushmeat.^[74][75] In equatorial Africa, human consumption of bushmeat has been linked to animal-to-human transmission of diseases, including Ebola.^[76]

Although it is not entirely clear how Ebola initially spreads from animals to humans, the spread is believed to involve direct contact with an infected wild animal or fruit bat.^[55] Besides bats, other wild animals sometimes infected with EBOV include several species of monkeys such as baboons, great apes (chimpanzees and gorillas), and duikers (a species of antelope).^[77]

Animals may become infected when they eat fruit partially eaten by bats carrying the virus.^[78] Fruit production, animal behavior and other factors may trigger outbreaks among animal populations.^[78]

Evidence indicates that both domestic dogs and pigs can also be infected with EBOV.^[79] Dogs do not appear to develop symptoms when they carry the virus, and pigs appear to be able to transmit the virus to at least some primates.^[79] Although some dogs in an area in which a human outbreak occurred had antibodies to EBOV, it is unclear whether they played a role in spreading the disease to people.^[79]

Reservoir

The natural reservoir for Ebola has yet to be confirmed; however, bats are considered to be the most likely candidate.^[56] Three types of fruit bats (Hypsignathus monstrosus, Epomops franqueti and Myonycteris torquata) were found to possibly carry the virus without getting sick.^[80] As of 2013, whether other animals are involved in its spread is not known.^[79] Plants, arthropods, rodents, and birds have also been considered possible viral reservoirs.^[1][26]

Bats were known to roost in the cotton factory in which the first cases of the 1976 and 1979 outbreaks were observed, and they have also been implicated in Marburg virus infections in 1975 and 1980.^[81] Of 24 plant and 19 vertebrate species experimentally inoculated with EBOV, only bats became infected.^[82] The bats displayed no clinical signs of disease, which is considered evidence that these bats are a reservoir species of EBOV. In a 2002–2003 survey of 1,030 animals including 679 bats from Gabon and the Republic of the Congo, immunoglobulin G (IgG) immune defense molecules indicative of Ebola infection were found in three bat species; at various periods of study, between 2.2 and 22.6% of bats were found to contain both RNA sequences and IgG molecules indicating Ebola infection.^[83] Antibodies against Zaire and Reston viruses have been found in fruit bats in Bangladesh, suggesting that these bats are also potential hosts of the virus and that the filoviruses are present in Asia.^[84]

Between 1976 and 1998, in 30,000 mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and arthropods sampled from regions of EBOV outbreaks, no Ebola virus was detected apart from some genetic traces found in six rodents (belonging to the species Mus setulosus and Praomys) and one shrew (Sylvisorex ollula) collected from the Central African Republic.^[81][85] However, further research efforts have not confirmed rodents as a reservoir.^[86] Traces of EBOV were detected in the carcasses of gorillas and chimpanzees during outbreaks in 2001 and 2003, which later became the source of human infections. However, the high rates of death in these species resulting from EBOV infection make it unlikely that these species represent a natural reservoir for the virus.^[81]

Deforestation has been mentioned as a possible contributor to recent outbreaks, including the West African Ebola virus epidemic. Index cases of EVD have often been close to recently deforested lands.^[87][88]

Immune system evasion

Filoviral infection also interferes with proper functioning of the innate immune system.^[46][48] EBOV proteins blunt the human immune system's response to viral infections by interfering with the cells' ability to produce and respond to interferon proteins such as interferon-alpha, interferon-beta, and interferon gamma.^[47][91]

The VP24 and VP35 structural proteins of EBOV play a key role in this interference. When a cell is infected with EBOV, receptors located in the cell's cytosol (such as RIG-I and MDA5) or outside of the cytosol (such as Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3), TLR7, TLR8 and TLR9) recognise infectious molecules associated with the virus.^[47] On TLR activation, proteins including interferon regulatory factor 3 and interferon regulatory factor 7 trigger a signalling cascade that leads to the expression of type 1 interferons.^[47] The type 1 interferons are then released and bind to the IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 receptors expressed on the surface of a neighbouring cell.^[47] Once interferon has bound to its receptors on the neighbouring cell, the signalling proteins STAT1 and STAT2 are activated and move to the cell's nucleus.^[47] This triggers the expression of interferon-stimulated genes, which code for proteins with antiviral properties.^[47] EBOV's V24 protein blocks the production of these antiviral proteins by preventing the STAT1 signalling protein in the neighbouring cell from entering the nucleus.^[47] The VP35 protein directly inhibits the production of interferon-beta.^[91] By inhibiting these immune responses, EBOV may quickly spread throughout the body.^[45]

Laboratory testing

Possible non-specific laboratory indicators of EVD include a low platelet count; an initially decreased white blood cell count followed by an increased white blood cell count; elevated levels of the liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST); and abnormalities in blood clotting often consistent with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) such as a prolonged prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, and bleeding time.^[92] Filovirions such as EBOV may be identified by their unique filamentous shapes in cell cultures examined with electron microscopy.^[93]

The specific diagnosis of EVD is confirmed by isolating the virus, detecting its RNA or proteins, or detecting antibodies against the virus in a person's blood.^[94] Isolating the virus by cell culture, detecting the viral RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)^[7][20] and detecting proteins by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are methods best used in the early stages of the disease and also for detecting the virus in human remains.^[7][94] Detecting antibodies against the virus is most reliable in the later stages of the disease and in those who recover.^[94] IgM antibodies are detectable two days after symptom onset and IgG antibodies can be detected six to 18 days after symptom onset.^[20] During an outbreak, isolation of the virus with cell culture methods is often not feasible. In field or mobile hospitals, the most common and sensitive diagnostic methods are real-time PCR and ELISA.^[95] In 2014, with new mobile testing facilities deployed in parts of Liberia, test results were obtained 3–5 hours after sample submission.^[96] In 2015, a rapid antigen test which gives results in 15 minutes was approved for use by WHO.^[97] It is able to confirm Ebola in 92% of those affected and rule it out in 85% of those not affected.^[97]

Differential diagnosis

Early symptoms of EVD may be similar to those of other diseases common in Africa, including malaria and dengue fever.^[22] The symptoms are also similar to those of other viral haemorrhagic fevers such as Marburg virus disease, Crimean Congo haemorrhagic fever, and Lassa fever.^[98][99]

The complete differential diagnosis is extensive and requires consideration of many other infectious diseases such as typhoid fever, shigellosis, rickettsial diseases, cholera, sepsis, borreliosis, EHEC enteritis, leptospirosis, scrub typhus, plague, Q fever, candidiasis, histoplasmosis, trypanosomiasis, visceral leishmaniasis, measles, and viral hepatitis among others.^[100]

Non-infectious diseases that may result in symptoms similar to those of EVD include acute promyelocytic leukaemia, haemolytic uraemic syndrome, snake envenomation, clotting factor deficiencies/platelet disorders, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia, Kawasaki disease, and warfarin poisoning.^{[95][101][102][103]}

Vaccines

An Ebola vaccine, rVSV-ZEBOV, was approved in the United States in December 2019.^[9] It appears to be fully effective ten days after being given.^[9] It was studied in Guinea between 2014, and 2016.^[9] More than 100,000 people have been vaccinated against Ebola as of 2019.^[104]

Infection control

VHF isolation precautions poster

Caregivers

British woman wearing protective gear

People who care for those infected with Ebola should wear protective clothing including masks, gloves, gowns and goggles.^[105] The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommend that the protective gear leaves no skin exposed.^[106] These measures are also recommended for those who may handle objects contaminated by an infected person's body fluids.^[107] In 2014, the CDC began recommending that medical personnel receive training on the proper suit-up and removal of personal protective equipment (PPE); in addition, a designated person, appropriately trained in biosafety, should be watching each step of these procedures to ensure they are done correctly.^[106] In Sierra Leone, the typical training period for the use of such safety equipment lasts approximately 12 days.^[108]

Putting on protective equipment

• Introduction
• Trained observer
• Removing own clothing
• Examining equipment
• Hand cleaning
• Boot covers
• Inner gloves
• Coverall
• N95 respirator
• Surgical hood
• Outer apron
• Outer gloves
• Face shield
• Verification

Removing protective equipment

• Personal protective equipment and gown
• Personal protective equipment and coveralls
• N95 and coveralls

Isolation

Isolation refers to separating those who are sick from those who are not. Quarantine refers to separating those who may have been exposed to a disease until they either show signs of the disease or are no longer at risk.^[121] Quarantine, also known as enforced isolation, is usually effective in decreasing spread.^[122][123] Governments often quarantine areas where the disease is occurring or individuals who may transmit the disease outside of an initial area.^[124] In the United States, the law allows quarantine of those infected with ebolaviruses.^[125][126]

Contact tracing

Contact tracing is considered important to contain an outbreak. It involves finding everyone who had close contact with infected individuals and monitoring them for signs of illness for 21 days. If any of these contacts comes down with the disease, they should be isolated, tested and treated. Then the process is repeated, tracing the contacts' contacts.^[127][128]

Standard support

A hospital isolation ward in Gulu, Uganda, during the October 2000 outbreak

Treatment is primarily supportive in nature.^[133] Early supportive care with rehydration and symptomatic treatment improves survival.^[1] Rehydration may be via the oral or intravenous route.^[133] These measures may include pain management, and treatment for nausea, fever, and anxiety.^[133] The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends avoiding aspirin or ibuprofen for pain management, due to the risk of bleeding associated with these medications.^[134]

Blood products such as packed red blood cells, platelets, or fresh frozen plasma may also be used.^[133] Other regulators of coagulation have also been tried including heparin in an effort to prevent disseminated intravascular coagulation and clotting factors to decrease bleeding.^[133] Antimalarial medications and antibiotics are often used before the diagnosis is confirmed,^[133] though there is no evidence to suggest such treatment helps. Several experimental treatments are being studied.^[135]

Where hospital care is not possible, the WHO's guidelines for home care have been relatively successful. Recommendations include using towels soaked in a bleach solution when moving infected people or bodies and also applying bleach on stains. It is also recommended that the caregivers wash hands with bleach solutions and cover their mouth and nose with a cloth.^[136]

Intensive care

Intensive care is often used in the developed world.^[30] This may include maintaining blood volume and electrolytes (salts) balance as well as treating any bacterial infections that may develop.^[30] Dialysis may be needed for kidney failure, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may be used for lung dysfunction.^[30]

1976

Sudan

Cotton factory in Nzara, South Sudan where the first outbreak occurred

The first known outbreak of EVD was identified only after the fact. It occurred between June and November 1976, in Nzara, South Sudan^[38][148] (then part of Sudan), and was caused by Sudan virus (SUDV). The Sudan outbreak infected 284 people and killed 151. The first identifiable case in Sudan occurred on 27 June in a storekeeper in a cotton factory in Nzara, who was hospitalised on 30 June and died on 6 July.^[30][149] Although the WHO medical staff involved in the Sudan outbreak knew that they were dealing with a heretofore unknown disease, the actual "positive identification" process and the naming of the virus did not occur until some months later in Zaire.^[149]

Zaire

Main article: 1976 Zaire Ebola virus outbreak

A CDC worker incinerates medical waste from Ebola patients in Zaire in 1976.

On 26 August 1976, a second outbreak of EVD began in Yambuku, a small rural village in Mongala District in northern Zaire (now known as the Democratic Republic of the Congo).^[150][151] This outbreak was caused by EBOV, formerly designated Zaire ebolavirus, a different member of the genus Ebolavirus than in the first Sudan outbreak. The first person infected with the disease was the village school's headmaster Mabalo Lokela, who began displaying symptoms on 26 August 1976.^[152] Lokela had returned from a trip to Northern Zaire near the border of the Central African Republic, after visiting the Ebola River between 12 and 22 August. He was originally believed to have malaria and given quinine. However, his symptoms continued to worsen, and he was admitted to Yambuku Mission Hospital on 5 September. Lokela died on 8 September 14 days after he began displaying symptoms.^[153][154]

Soon after Lokela's death, others who had been in contact with him also died, and people in Yambuku began to panic. The country's Minister of Health and Zaire President Mobutu Sese Seko declared the entire region, including Yambuku and the country's capital, Kinshasa, a quarantine zone. No-one was permitted to enter or leave the area, and roads, waterways, and airfields were placed under martial law. Schools, businesses and social organisations were closed.^[155] The initial response was led by Congolese doctors, including Jean-Jacques Muyembe-Tamfum, one of the discoverers of Ebola. Muyembe took a blood sample from a Belgian nun; this sample would eventually be used by Peter Piot to identify the previously unknown Ebola virus.^[156] Muyembe was also the first scientist to come into direct contact with the disease and survive.^[157] Researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), including Piot, co-discoverer of Ebola, later arrived to assess the effects of the outbreak, observing that "the whole region was in panic."^{[158][159][160]}

Piot concluded that Belgian nuns had inadvertently started the epidemic by giving unnecessary vitamin injections to pregnant women without sterilizing the syringes and needles. The outbreak lasted 26 days and the quarantine lasted two weeks. Researchers speculated that the disease disappeared due to the precautions taken by locals, the quarantine of the area, and discontinuing the injections.^[155]

During this outbreak, Ngoy Mushola recorded the first clinical description of EVD in Yambuku, where he wrote the following in his daily log: "The illness is characterised with a high temperature of about 39 °C (102 °F), haematemesis, diarrhoea with blood, retrosternal abdominal pain, prostration with 'heavy' articulations, and rapid evolution death after a mean of three days."^[161]

The virus responsible for the initial outbreak, first thought to be Marburg virus, was later identified as a new type of virus related to the genus Marburgvirus. Virus strain samples isolated from both outbreaks were named "Ebola virus" after the Ebola River, near the first-identified viral outbreak site in Zaire.^[30] Reports conflict about who initially coined the name: either Karl Johnson of the American CDC team^[162] or Belgian researchers.^[163] Subsequently, a number of other cases were reported, almost all centred on the Yambuku mission hospital or close contacts of another case.^[152] In all, 318 cases and 280 deaths (an 88% fatality rate) occurred in Zaire.^[164] Although the two outbreaks were at first believed connected, scientists later realised that they were caused by two distinct ebolaviruses, SUDV and EBOV.^[151]

1995–2014

Cases of Ebola fever in Africa since 1976

The second major outbreak occurred in Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo, DRC), in 1995, affecting 315 and killing 254.^[1]

In 2000, Uganda had an outbreak infecting 425 and killing 224; in this case, the Sudan virus was found to be the Ebola species responsible for the outbreak.^[1]

In 2003, an outbreak in the DRC infected 143 and killed 128, a 90% death rate, the highest of a genus Ebolavirus outbreak to date.^[165]

In 2004, a Russian scientist died from Ebola after sticking herself with an infected needle.^[166]

Between April and August 2007, a fever epidemic^[167] in a four-village region^[168] of the DRC was confirmed in September to have been cases of Ebola.^[169] Many people who attended the recent funeral of a local village chief died.^[168] The 2007 outbreak eventually infected 264 individuals and killed 187.^[1]

On 30 November 2007, the Uganda Ministry of Health confirmed an outbreak of Ebola in the Bundibugyo District in Western Uganda. After confirming samples tested by the United States National Reference Laboratories and the Centers for Disease Control, the World Health Organization (WHO) confirmed the presence of a new species of genus Ebolavirus, which was tentatively named Bundibugyo.^[170] The WHO reported 149 cases of this new strain and 37 of those led to deaths.^[1]

The WHO confirmed two small outbreaks in Uganda in 2012, both caused by the Sudan variant. The first outbreak affected seven people, killing four, and the second affected 24, killing 17.^[1]

On 17 August 2012, the Ministry of Health of the DRC reported an outbreak of the Ebola-Bundibugyo variant^[171] in the eastern region.^[172][173] Other than its discovery in 2007, this was the only time that this variant has been identified as responsible for an outbreak. The WHO revealed that the virus had sickened 57 people and killed 29. The probable cause of the outbreak was tainted bush meat hunted by local villagers around the towns of Isiro and Viadana.^[1][174]

In 2014, an outbreak occurred in the DRC. Genome-sequencing showed that this outbreak was not related to the 2014–15 West Africa Ebola virus outbreak, but was the same EBOV species, the Zaire species.^[175] It began in August 2014, and was declared over in November with 66 cases and 49 deaths.^[176] This was the 7th outbreak in the DRC, three of which occurred during the period when the country was known as Zaire.^[177]

2013–2016 West Africa

Cases and deaths from April 2014 to July 2015 during the 2013–2015 outbreak

In March 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported a major Ebola outbreak in Guinea, a West African nation.^[178] Researchers traced the outbreak to a one-year-old child who died in December 2013.^[179][180] The disease rapidly spread to the neighbouring countries of Liberia and Sierra Leone. It was the largest Ebola outbreak ever documented, and the first recorded in the region.^[178] On 8 August 2014, the WHO declared the epidemic an international public health emergency. Urging the world to offer aid to the affected regions, its Director-General said, "Countries affected to date simply do not have the capacity to manage an outbreak of this size and complexity on their own. I urge the international community to provide this support on the most urgent basis possible."^[181] By mid-August 2014, Doctors Without Borders reported the situation in Liberia's capital, Monrovia, was "catastrophic" and "deteriorating daily". They reported that fears of Ebola among staff members and patients had shut down much of the city's health system, leaving many people without medical treatment for other conditions.^[182] In a 26 September statement, WHO said, "The Ebola epidemic ravaging parts of West Africa is the most severe acute public health emergency seen in modern times. Never before in recorded history has a biosafety level four pathogen infected so many people so quickly, over such a broad geographical area, for so long."^[183]

Intense contact tracing and strict isolation largely prevented further spread of the disease in the countries that had imported cases. {{#section:Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa|casesasof}}, {{#section:Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa|cases}} suspected cases and {{#section:Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa|deaths}} deaths were reported;{{#section:Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa|caserefs}}^[184] however, the WHO said that these numbers may be underestimated.^[185] Because they work closely with the body fluids of infected patients, healthcare workers were especially vulnerable to infection; in August 2014, the WHO reported that 10% of the dead were healthcare workers.^[186]

2014 Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa

In September 2014, it was estimated that the countries' capacity for treating Ebola patients was insufficient by the equivalent of 2,122 beds; by December there were a sufficient number of beds to treat and isolate all reported Ebola cases, although the uneven distribution of cases was causing serious shortfalls in some areas.^[187] On 28 January 2015, the WHO reported that for the first time since the week ending 29 June 2014, there had been fewer than 100 new confirmed cases reported in a week in the three most-affected countries. The response to the epidemic then moved to a second phase, as the focus shifted from slowing transmission to ending the epidemic.^[188] On 8 April 2015, the WHO reported only 30 confirmed cases, the lowest weekly total since the third week of May 2014.^[189]

On 29 December 2015, 42 days after the last person tested negative for a second time, Guinea was declared free of Ebola transmission.^[190] At that time, a 90-day period of heightened surveillance was announced by that agency. "This is the first time that all three countries – Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone – have stopped the original chains of transmission ...", the organisation stated in a news release.^[191] A new case was detected in Sierra Leone on 14 January 2016.^[192] However, the outbreak was declared no longer an emergency on 29 March 2016.^[13]

2017 Democratic Republic of the Congo

On 11 May 2017, the DRC Ministry of Public Health notified the WHO about an outbreak of Ebola. Four people died, and four people survived; five of these eight cases were laboratory-confirmed. A total of 583 contacts were monitored. On 2 July 2017, the WHO declared the end of the outbreak.^[203]

2018 Équateur province

On 14 May 2018, the World Health Organization reported that "the Democratic Republic of Congo reported 39 suspected, probable or confirmed cases of Ebola between 4 April and 13 May, including 19 deaths."^[204] Some 393 people identified as contacts of Ebola patients were being followed up. The outbreak centred on the Bikoro, Iboko, and Wangata areas in Equateur province,^[204] including in the large city of Mbandaka. The DRC Ministry of Public Health approved the use of an experimental vaccine.^{[205][206][207]} On 13 May 2018, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus visited Bikoro.^[208] Reports emerged that maps of the area were inaccurate, not so much hampering medical providers as epidemiologists and officials trying to assess the outbreak and containment efforts.^[209] The 2018 outbreak in the DRC was declared over on 24 July 2018.^[17]

2018–2020 Kivu

On 1 August 2018, the world's 10th Ebola outbreak was declared in North Kivu province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. It was the first Ebola outbreak in a military conflict zone, with thousands of refugees in the area.^[210][211] By November 2018, nearly 200 Congolese had died of Ebola, about half of them from the city of Beni, where armed groups are fighting over the region's mineral wealth, impeding medical relief efforts.^[212]

By March 2019, this became the second largest Ebola outbreak ever recorded, with more than 1,000 cases and insecurity continuing to being the major resistance to providing an adequate response.^[213][214] As of 4 June 2019, the WHO reported 2025 confirmed and probable cases with 1357 deaths.^[215] In June 2019, two people died of Ebola in neighbouring Uganda.^[216]

In July 2019, an infected man travelled to Goma, home to more than two million people.^[217] One week later, on 17 July 2019, the WHO declared the Ebola outbreak a global health emergency, the fifth time such a declaration has been made by the organisation.^[218] A government spokesman said that half of the Ebola cases are unidentified, and he added that the current outbreak could last up to three years.^[219]

On 25 June 2020, the second biggest EVD outbreak ever was declared over.^[220]

2020 Équateur province

On 1 June 2020, the Congolese health ministry announced a new DRC outbreak of Ebola in Mbandaka, Équateur Province, a region along the Congo River. Genome sequencing suggests that this outbreak, the 11th outbreak since the virus was first discovered in the country in 1976, is unrelated to the one in North Kivu Province or the previous outbreak in the same area in 2018. It was reported that six cases had been identified; four of the people had died. It is expected that more people will be identified as surveillance activities increase.^[221] By 15 June the case count had increased to 17 with 11 deaths, with more than 2,500 people having been vaccinated.^[222]

Weaponisation

Ebolavirus is classified as a biosafety level 4 agent, as well as a Category A bioterrorism agent by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.^[89][223] It has the potential to be weaponised for use in biological warfare,^[224][225] and was investigated by Biopreparat for such use, but might be difficult to prepare as a weapon of mass destruction because the virus becomes ineffective quickly in open air.^[226] Fake emails pretending to be Ebola information from the WHO or the Mexican Government have, in 2014, been misused to spread computer malware.^[227] The BBC reported in 2015 that "North Korean state media has suggested the disease was created by the U.S. military as a biological weapon."^[228]

Literature

Richard Preston's 1995 best-selling book, The Hot Zone, dramatised the Ebola outbreak in Reston, Virginia.^{[229][230][231]}

William Close's 1995 Ebola: A Documentary Novel of Its First Explosion^[232][233] and 2002 Ebola: Through the Eyes of the People focused on individuals' reactions to the 1976 Ebola outbreak in Zaire.^[234][235]

Tom Clancy's 1996 novel, Executive Orders, involves a Middle Eastern terrorist attack on the United States using an airborne form of a deadly Ebola virus strain named "Ebola Mayinga" (see Mayinga N'Seka).^[236][237]

As the Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa developed in 2014, a number of popular self-published and well-reviewed books containing sensational and misleading information about the disease appeared in electronic and printed formats. The authors of some such books admitted that they lacked medical credentials and were not technically qualified to give medical advice. The World Health Organization and the United Nations stated that such misinformation had contributed to the spread of the disease.^[238]

Wild animals

Ebola has a high mortality rate among primates.^[239] Frequent outbreaks of Ebola may have resulted in the deaths of 5,000 gorillas.^[240] Outbreaks of Ebola may have been responsible for an 88% decline in tracking indices of observed chimpanzee populations in the 420 km² Lossi Sanctuary between 2002 and 2003.^[241] Transmission among chimpanzees through meat consumption constitutes a significant risk factor, whereas contact between the animals, such as touching dead bodies and grooming, is not.^[242]

Recovered gorilla carcasses have contained multiple Ebola virus strains, suggesting multiple introductions of the virus. Bodies decompose quickly and carcasses are not infectious after three to four days. Contact between gorilla groups is rare, suggesting that transmission among gorilla groups is unlikely, and that outbreaks result from transmission between viral reservoirs and animal populations.^[241]

Domestic animals

In 2012, it was demonstrated that the virus can travel without contact from pigs to nonhuman primates, although the same study failed to achieve transmission in that manner between primates.^[79][243]

Dogs may become infected with EBOV but not develop symptoms. Dogs in some parts of Africa scavenge for food, and they sometimes eat EBOV-infected animals and also the corpses of humans. A 2005 survey of dogs during an EBOV outbreak found that although they remain asymptomatic, about 32 percent of dogs closest to an outbreak showed a seroprevalence for EBOV versus nine percent of those farther away.^[244] The authors concluded that there were "potential implications for preventing and controlling human outbreaks."

Reston virus

In late 1989, Hazelton Research Products' Reston Quarantine Unit in Reston, Virginia, suffered an outbreak of fatal illness amongst certain lab monkeys. This lab outbreak was initially diagnosed as simian haemorrhagic fever virus (SHFV) and occurred amongst a shipment of crab-eating macaque monkeys imported from the Philippines. Hazelton's veterinary pathologist sent tissue samples from dead animals to the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, Maryland, where an ELISA test indicated the antibodies present in the tissue were a response to Ebola virus and not SHFV.^[245] An electron microscopist from USAMRIID discovered filoviruses similar in appearance to Ebola in the tissue samples sent from Hazelton Research Products' Reston Quarantine Unit.^[246]

A US Army team headquartered at USAMRIID euthanised the surviving monkeys, and brought all the monkeys to Ft. Detrick for study by the Army's veterinary pathologists and virologists, and eventual disposal under safe conditions.^[245] Blood samples were taken from 178 animal handlers during the incident.^[247] Of those, six animal handlers eventually seroconverted, including one who had cut himself with a bloody scalpel.^[90][248] Despite its status as a Level‑4 organism and its apparent pathogenicity in monkeys, when the handlers did not become ill, the CDC concluded that the virus had a very low pathogenicity to humans.^[248][249]

The Philippines and the United States had no previous cases of Ebola infection, and upon further isolation, researchers concluded it was another strain of Ebola, or a new filovirus of Asian origin, which they named Reston ebolavirus (RESTV) after the location of the incident.^[245] Reston virus (RESTV) can be transmitted to pigs.^[79] Since the initial outbreak it has since been found in nonhuman primates in Pennsylvania, Texas, and Italy,^[250] where the virus had infected pigs.^[251] According to the WHO, routine cleaning and disinfection of pig (or monkey) farms with sodium hypochlorite or detergents should be effective in inactivating the Reston ebolavirus. Pigs that have been infected with RESTV tend to show symptoms of the disease.^[252]

Treatments

Researchers looking at slides of cultures of cells that make monoclonal antibodies. These are grown in a lab and the researchers are analyzing the products to select the most promising.

As of July 2015, no medication has been proven safe and effective for treating Ebola. By the time the Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa began in 2013, there were at least nine different candidate treatments. Several trials were conducted in late 2014, and early 2015, but some were abandoned due to lack of efficacy or lack of people to study.^[253]

As of August 2019, two experimental treatments known as REGN-EB3 and mAb114 were found to be 90% effective.^{[254][255][256]}

Diagnostic tests

The diagnostic tests currently available require specialised equipment and highly trained personnel. Since there are few suitable testing centres in West Africa, this leads to delay in diagnosis.^[257]

On 29 November 2014, a new 15-minute Ebola test was reported that if successful, "not only gives patients a better chance of survival, but it prevents transmission of the virus to other people." The new equipment, about the size of a laptop and solar-powered, allows testing to be done in remote areas.^[258]

On 29 December 2014, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the LightMix Ebola Zaire rRT-PCR test for patients with symptoms of Ebola.^[259]

Disease models

Animal models and in particular non-human primates are being used to study different aspects of Ebola virus disease. Developments in organ-on-a-chip technology have led to a chip-based model for Ebola haemorrhagic syndrome.^[260]

Bibliography